Literature DB >> 20692118

Patients' reaction to the disclosure of rare dreaded adverse events.

Liana Fraenkel1, Ellen Peters.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians must frequently inform their patients of the risks of rare, but serious, adverse events (AEs).
OBJECTIVE: To examine how patients react to the disclosure of rare AEs.
METHODS: Outpatients viewed a video of a physician describing a medication associated with a rare AE. Subjects then rated their worry, perceived chance of developing the AE, and willingness to take the medication.
RESULTS: Non-White men were more likely to perceive a greater chance of developing the AE compared to White men [Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) = 3.37 (1.09-10.45)]; White women were more likely to be worried [2.00 (0.95-4.24)] and to perceive a greater chance of developing the [6.22 (2.50-15.50)], perceive a greater chance of developing the AE [6.27 (2.43-16.15)], and be less willing to take the medication [0.23 (0.09-0.59)], compared to White men.
CONCLUSIONS: Gender and ethnicity influence how patients react to disclosure of rare, but serious, AEs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: An improved understanding of patients' risk perceptions is required to inform the development of best practices to improve risk communication. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20692118      PMCID: PMC3033459          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  7 in total

1.  Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield.

Authors:  P Slovic
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Discrimination, vulnerability, and justice in the face of risk.

Authors:  Terre A Satterfield; C K Mertz; Paul Slovic
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Beyond information: exploring patients' preferences.

Authors:  Ronald M Epstein; Ellen Peters
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Ethnic differences in risk perception among women at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  C Hughes; C Lerman; E Lustbader
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Gender and race in beliefs about outdoor air pollution.

Authors:  Branden B Johnson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument.

Authors:  T C Davis; S W Long; R H Jackson; E J Mayeaux; R B George; P W Murphy; M A Crouch
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks.

Authors:  J Flynn; P Slovic; C K Mertz
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.000

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Adverse drug reactions: when the risk becomes a reality for patients.

Authors:  Anthony R Cox; Tehreem F Butt
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.