Literature DB >> 20691791

Spatio-temporal brain dynamics in a combined stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflict task.

Sascha Frühholz1, Ben Godde, Mareike Finke, Manfred Herrmann.   

Abstract

It is yet not well known whether different types of conflicts share common or rely on distinct brain mechanisms of conflict processing. We used a combined Flanker (stimulus-stimulus; S-S) and Simon (stimulus-response; S-R) conflict paradigm both in an fMRI and an EEG study. S-S conflicts induced stronger behavioral interference effects compared to S-R conflicts and the latter decayed with increasing response latencies. Besides some similar medial frontal activity across all conflict trials, which was, however, not statically consistent across trials, we especially found distinct activations depending on the type of conflict. S-S conflicts activated the anterior cingulate cortex and modulated the N2 and early P3 component with underlying source activity in inferior frontal cortex. S-R conflicts produced distinct activations in the posterior cingulate cortex and modulated the late P3b component with underlying source activity in superior parietal cortex. Double conflict trials containing both S-S and S-R conflicts revealed, first, distinct anterior frontal activity representing a meta-processing unit and, second, a sequential modulation of the N2 and the P3b component. The N2 modulation during double conflict trials was accompanied by increased source activity in the medial frontal gyrus (MeFG). In summary, S-S and S-R conflict processing mostly rely on distinct mechanisms of conflict processing and these conflicts differentially modulate the temporal stages of stimulus processing.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20691791     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  31 in total

1.  Clarifying the relationship between mindfulness and executive attention: a combined behavioral and neurophysiological study.

Authors:  Yanli Lin; Megan E Fisher; Jason S Moser
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Parsing the Flanker task to reveal behavioral and oscillatory correlates of unattended conflict interference.

Authors:  Marcella Brunetti; Filippo Zappasodi; Pierpaolo Croce; Rosalia Di Matteo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Posterior Alpha and Gamma Oscillations Index Divergent and Superadditive Effects of Cognitive Interference.

Authors:  Alex I Wiesman; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Neural cascade of conflict processing: Not just time-on-task.

Authors:  Cameron C McKay; Berry van den Berg; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Three key regions for supervisory attentional control: evidence from neuroimaging meta-analyses.

Authors:  Edna C Cieslik; Veronika I Mueller; Claudia R Eickhoff; Robert Langner; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Preserved sensory processing but hampered conflict detection when stimulus input is task-irrelevant.

Authors:  Tristan Bekinschtein; Simon van Gaal; Stijn Adriaan Nuiten; Andrés Canales-Johnson; Lola Beerendonk; Nutsa Nanuashvili; Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Beta and gamma oscillations index cognitive interference effects across a distributed motor network.

Authors:  Alex I Wiesman; Sam M Koshy; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The neural dynamics of stimulus and response conflict processing as a function of response complexity and task demands.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Lawrence G Appelbaum; Cameron C McKay; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Epigenetic Markers of Aging Predict the Neural Oscillations Serving Selective Attention.

Authors:  Alex I Wiesman; Michael T Rezich; Jennifer O'Neill; Brenda Morsey; Tina Wang; Trey Ideker; Susan Swindells; Howard S Fox; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Is consciousness necessary for conflict adaptation? A state of the art.

Authors:  Kobe Desender; Eva Van den Bussche
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.