Literature DB >> 20690783

Pharmacokinetics of vandetanib in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment.

Angelika Weil1, Paul Martin, Robert Smith, Stuart Oliver, Peter Langmuir, Jessica Read, Karl-Heinz Molz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Vandetanib, an oncology drug being evaluated in phase III clinical trials, undergoes significant renal and hepatic excretion. The objective of these two studies was to investigate the single-dose pharmacokinetics of vandetanib in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment in comparison with healthy subjects. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two open-label, parallel-group studies were conducted at a single centre in Germany. Subjects aged 18-75 years with a body mass index of 18-32 kg/m2 were eligible. The renal impairment study recruited subjects with normal renal function and mild, moderate and severe renal impairment according to creatinine clearance calculated from a 24-hour urine collection pre-dose. The hepatic impairment study recruited subjects with normal hepatic function and mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment according to the Child-Pugh classification. All subjects received a single 800 mg oral vandetanib dose. Blood samples for measurement of vandetanib, N-desmethylvandetanib and vandetanib N-oxide were collected before and at various timepoints after vandetanib administration for up to 63 days. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods.
RESULTS: Thirty-two subjects were recruited for the renal impairment study (ten with normal renal function and six, ten and six with mild, moderate and severe impairment, respectively). Thirty subjects were recruited for the hepatic impairment study (eight with normal hepatic function and eight, eight and six with mild, moderate and severe impairment, respectively). The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(infinity)) values of free vandetanib increased by approximately 46%, 62% and 79% in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. These increases were statistically significant, with the increase in the severe renal impairment group having the possibility of being double the value observed in subjects with normal renal function (geometric least squares [GLS] mean ratio [renal impairment : normal renal function] of 1.79; 90% CI 1.39, 2.31). Peak plasma concentrations of free vandetanib increased slightly by approximately 7%, 9% and 11% in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. Total plasma clearance of free vandetanib decreased with all degrees of renal dysfunction. Hepatic impairment did not have a statistically significant effect on the AUC(infinity) of total vandetanib. Peak plasma concentrations of total vandetanib were reduced in subjects with all classifications of hepatic impairment compared with normal hepatic function, with a statistically significant effect in the severe hepatic impairment group (GLS mean ratio 0.71; 90% CI 0.53, 0.96). Increased exposure to both metabolites was seen in subjects with renal impairment. Exposure to N-desmethylvandetanib was reduced in subjects with hepatic impairment, while exposure to vandetanib N-oxide was increased in subjects with severe hepatic impairment. Vandetanib was well tolerated and had a similar tolerability profile in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment compared with healthy subjects.
CONCLUSION: Exposure to vandetanib was increased by about 46%, 62% and 79% in subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. A doubling in exposure could be ruled out in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment but not for those with severe renal impairment. The possibility of dose reductions in patients with severe renal impairment will need to be assessed when the safety and tolerability profile is fully defined. Exposure to vandetanib was not altered in subjects with hepatic impairment, and no dose adjustment would be expected in patients with hepatic impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20690783     DOI: 10.2165/11534330-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  20 in total

Review 1.  The hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  D Hanahan; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Clinical and pharmacologic study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in cancer patients with normal or mildly or moderately impaired hepatic function.

Authors:  Wandena S Siegel-Lakhai; Mirjam Crul; Peter De Porre; Steven Zhang; Ilsung Chang; Henk Boot; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Drug dosing in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Steven Gabardi; Stuart Abramson
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.456

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetics of anticancer agents in patients with impaired liver function.

Authors:  M G Donelli; M Zucchetti; E Munzone; M D'Incalci; A Crosignani
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction.

Authors:  Roger K Verbeeck
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  The effect of chronic renal failure on drug metabolism and transport.

Authors:  Albert W Dreisbach; Juan J L Lertora
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.481

7.  Novel 4-anilinoquinazolines with C-7 basic side chains: design and structure activity relationship of a series of potent, orally active, VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Laurent F Hennequin; Elaine S E Stokes; Andrew P Thomas; Craig Johnstone; Patrick A Plé; Donald J Ogilvie; Michael Dukes; Stephen R Wedge; Jane Kendrew; Jon O Curwen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-03-14       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Randomized phase II study of vandetanib alone or with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  John V Heymach; Luis Paz-Ares; Filippo De Braud; Martin Sebastian; David J Stewart; Wilfried E E Eberhardt; Anantbhushan A Ranade; Graham Cohen; Jose Manuel Trigo; Alan B Sandler; Philip D Bonomi; Roy S Herbst; Annetta D Krebs; James Vasselli; Bruce E Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Regulation of p27Kip1 protein levels contributes to mitogenic effects of the RET/PTC kinase in thyroid carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Donata Vitagliano; Francesca Carlomagno; Maria Letizia Motti; Giuseppe Viglietto; Yuri E Nikiforov; Marina N Nikiforova; Jerome M Hershman; Anderson J Ryan; Alfredo Fusco; Rosa Marina Melillo; Massimo Santoro
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  ZD6474, an orally available inhibitor of KDR tyrosine kinase activity, efficiently blocks oncogenic RET kinases.

Authors:  Francesca Carlomagno; Donata Vitagliano; Teresa Guida; Fortunato Ciardiello; Giampaolo Tortora; Giancarlo Vecchio; Anderson J Ryan; Gabriella Fontanini; Alfredo Fusco; Massimo Santoro
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Drug disposition alterations in liver disease: extrahepatic effects in cholestasis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Mark J Canet; Nathan J Cherrington
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 2.  Renal effects of targeted anticancer therapies.

Authors:  Camillo Porta; Laura Cosmai; Maurizio Gallieni; Paolo Pedrazzoli; Fabio Malberti
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Pharmacokinetics of the novel PAR-1 antagonist vorapaxar in patients with hepatic impairment.

Authors:  Paul Statkevich; Teddy Kosoglou; Richard A Preston; Bharath Kumar; Fengjuan Xuan; Craig Trusley; James E Schiller; Ronald B Langdon; David L Cutler
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Pharmacokinetic evaluations of the co-administrations of vandetanib and metformin, digoxin, midazolam, omeprazole or ranitidine.

Authors:  Susanne Johansson; Jessica Read; Stuart Oliver; Mark Steinberg; Yan Li; Eleanor Lisbon; David Mathews; Philip T Leese; Paul Martin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Vandetanib for the treatment of metastatic medullary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Nils Degrauwe; Julie Ann Sosa; Sanziana Roman; Hari A Deshpande
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2012-06-07

Review 6.  Decreased Disposition of Anticancer Drugs Predominantly Eliminated via the Liver in Patients with Renal Failure.

Authors:  Kenichi Fujita; Natsumi Matsumoto; Hiroo Ishida; Yutaro Kubota; Shinichi Iwai; Motoko Shibanuma; Yukio Kato
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 7.  Vandetanib: in medullary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  James E Frampton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Efficacy and tolerability of pharmacotherapy options for the treatment of medullary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  H A Deshpande; K Sheth; J A Sosa; S Roman
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2012-10-31

Review 9.  Recent advances in the biology and therapy of medullary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Barry Nelkin
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-12-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.