Literature DB >> 20690599

Water confinement in hydrophobic nanopores. Pressure-induced wetting and drying.

Sergei Smirnov1, Ivan Vlassiouk, Pavel Takmakov, Fabian Rios.   

Abstract

Wetting and drying of hydrophobic pores with diameters lower than 0.2 μm by aqueous solutions at different hydrostatic pressures is investigated by measuring the ionic conductance variation through the nanopores. The critical pressure for water intrusion into the nanopores increases with lowering the pore diameter and the surface tension of the hydrophobic modification, in agreement with the Laplace equation. Nevertheless, restoring the pressure to the atmospheric one does not result in spontaneous pore dewetting unless bubbles are left inside the pores. Such bubbles can appear at the regions of narrowing cross section and/or varying quality of the hydrophobic modification and thus can be engineered to control water expulsion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20690599     DOI: 10.1021/nn101080k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  10 in total

1.  Electric-field-induced wetting and dewetting in single hydrophobic nanopores.

Authors:  Matthew R Powell; Leah Cleary; Matthew Davenport; Kenneth J Shea; Zuzanna S Siwy
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Electron beam induced local crystallization of HfO2 nanopores for biosensing applications.

Authors:  Jiwook Shim; Jose A Rivera; Rashid Bashir
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 7.790

3.  Intrusion and extrusion of water in hydrophobic nanopores.

Authors:  Antonio Tinti; Alberto Giacomello; Yaroslav Grosu; Carlo Massimo Casciola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Full wetting of plasmonic nanopores through two-component droplets.

Authors:  Chang Chen; XiuMei Xu; Yi Li; Hilde Jans; Pieter Neutens; Sarp Kerman; Guy Vereecke; Frank Holsteyns; Guido Maes; Liesbet Lagae; Tim Stakenborg; Pol van Dorpe
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 9.825

5.  Mechanistic correlation between water infiltration and framework hydrophilicity in MFI zeolites.

Authors:  Matteo Fasano; Alessio Bevilacqua; Eliodoro Chiavazzo; Thomas Humplik; Pietro Asinari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Rectified and Salt Concentration Dependent Wetting of Hydrophobic Nanopores.

Authors:  Jake W Polster; Fikret Aydin; J Pedro de Souza; Martin Z Bazant; Tuan Anh Pham; Zuzanna S Siwy
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 16.383

7.  Can Nanofluidic Chemical Release Enable Fast, High Resolution Neurotransmitter-Based Neurostimulation?

Authors:  Peter D Jones; Martin Stelzle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Effectiveness of the Young-Laplace equation at nanoscale.

Authors:  Hailong Liu; Guoxin Cao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Lithium-ion battery electrolyte mobility at nano-confined graphene interfaces.

Authors:  Boaz Moeremans; Hsiu-Wei Cheng; Qingyun Hu; Hector F Garces; Nitin P Padture; Frank Uwe Renner; Markus Valtiner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Role of Nanocomposite Support Stiffness on TFC Membrane Water Permeance.

Authors:  Jaime A Idarraga-Mora; Anthony S Childress; Parker S Friedel; David A Ladner; Apparao M Rao; Scott M Husson
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.