Peter A Dargaville1, Peter C Rimensberger, Inéz Frerichs. 1. Department of Paediatrics, Royal Hobart Hospital and University of Tasmania, Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia. peter.dargaville@dhhs.tas.gov.au
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether, during mechanical ventilation, an optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can be identified by measurement of regional tidal volume and compliance [V (T(reg)), C (RS(reg))]. METHODS: Sixteen anaesthetized intubated neonatal piglets underwent a stepwise vital capacity manoeuvre performed during pressure control ventilation, with 5 cmH₂O PEEP increments to 25 cmH₂O, and decrements to 0 cmH₂O. Peak inflating pressure was 10 cmH₂O above PEEP throughout. The manoeuvre was performed in the normal lung, after repeated saline lavage and after surfactant therapy. Global V (T) and C (RS) were measured at the airway opening; V (T(reg)) and C (RS(reg)) were measured in the ventral, medial and dorsal lung using electrical impedance tomography (EIT). RESULTS: Most uniform distribution of regional tidal ventilation was noted during PEEP decrements after lung recruitment, at varying PEEP levels. In the lavaged and surfactant-treated lung the PEEP optimal for ventilation distribution was also associated with highest mean V (T(reg)) [lavaged: 95 ± 9.3% of maximum, mean ± standard deviation (SD); surfactant-treated: 92 ± 17%] and global V (T) (96 ± 10%; 96 ± 15%). Regional C (RS) plots clearly demonstrated co-existent ventral overdistension and dorsal recruitment, particularly during PEEP increments; whereas during PEEP decrements, peak C (RS(reg)) values showed considerable interregional concordance [e.g. peak C (RS(reg)) in the lavaged left lung; ventral: 0.017 ± 0.0036; medial: 0.016 ± 0.0054; dorsal: 0.017 ± 0.0073 cmH₂O⁻¹; P = 0.98, analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. CONCLUSIONS: After lung recruitment, a PEEP level can be identified by EIT at which tidal ventilation is uniformly distributed, with associated concordance in compliance between lung regions. Bedside monitoring of regional tidal ventilation and compliance using EIT may thus aid in PEEP selection.
PURPOSE: To determine whether, during mechanical ventilation, an optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can be identified by measurement of regional tidal volume and compliance [V (T(reg)), C (RS(reg))]. METHODS: Sixteen anaesthetized intubated neonatal piglets underwent a stepwise vital capacity manoeuvre performed during pressure control ventilation, with 5 cmH₂O PEEP increments to 25 cmH₂O, and decrements to 0 cmH₂O. Peak inflating pressure was 10 cmH₂O above PEEP throughout. The manoeuvre was performed in the normal lung, after repeated saline lavage and after surfactant therapy. Global V (T) and C (RS) were measured at the airway opening; V (T(reg)) and C (RS(reg)) were measured in the ventral, medial and dorsal lung using electrical impedance tomography (EIT). RESULTS: Most uniform distribution of regional tidal ventilation was noted during PEEP decrements after lung recruitment, at varying PEEP levels. In the lavaged and surfactant-treated lung the PEEP optimal for ventilation distribution was also associated with highest mean V (T(reg)) [lavaged: 95 ± 9.3% of maximum, mean ± standard deviation (SD); surfactant-treated: 92 ± 17%] and global V (T) (96 ± 10%; 96 ± 15%). Regional C (RS) plots clearly demonstrated co-existent ventral overdistension and dorsal recruitment, particularly during PEEP increments; whereas during PEEP decrements, peak C (RS(reg)) values showed considerable interregional concordance [e.g. peak C (RS(reg)) in the lavaged left lung; ventral: 0.017 ± 0.0036; medial: 0.016 ± 0.0054; dorsal: 0.017 ± 0.0073 cmH₂O⁻¹; P = 0.98, analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. CONCLUSIONS: After lung recruitment, a PEEP level can be identified by EIT at which tidal ventilation is uniformly distributed, with associated concordance in compliance between lung regions. Bedside monitoring of regional tidal ventilation and compliance using EIT may thus aid in PEEP selection.
Authors: T E Kloot; L Blanch; A Melynne Youngblood; C Weinert; A B Adams; J J Marini; R S Shapiro; A Nahum Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Pier Paolo Terragni; Giulio Rosboch; Andrea Tealdi; Eleonora Corno; Eleonora Menaldo; Ottavio Davini; Giovanni Gandini; Peter Herrmann; Luciana Mascia; Michel Quintel; Arthur S Slutsky; Luciano Gattinoni; V Marco Ranieri Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2006-10-12 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: David G Tingay; Graeme R Polglase; Risha Bhatia; Clare A Berry; Robert J Kopotic; Clinton P Kopotic; Yong Song; Edgardo Szyld; Alan H Jobe; J Jane Pillow Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2015-01-29
Authors: Raffaele L Dellacà; C Veneroni; V Vendettuoli; E Zannin; P G Matassa; A Pedotti; M Colnaghi; F Mosca Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ilaria Milesi; David G Tingay; Emanuela Zannin; Federico Bianco; Paolo Tagliabue; Fabio Mosca; Anna Lavizzari; Maria Luisa Ventura; C Elroy Zonneveld; Elizabeth J Perkins; Don Black; Magdy Sourial; Raffaele L Dellacá Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: David G Tingay; Anushi Rajapaksa; Karen McCall; Cornelis E E Zonneveld; Don Black; Elizabeth Perkins; Magdy Sourial; Anna Lavizzari; Peter G Davis Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Seiha Yen; Yong Song; Melissa Preissner; Ellen Bennett; Richard Wilson; Macarena Pavez; Stephen Dubsky; Peter A Dargaville; Andreas Fouras; Graeme R Zosky Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2020-08-06