PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of ingesting versus mouth rinsing a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution on 1-h running performance. METHODS: After a 14- to 15-h fast, 10 endurance-trained male runners (mean ± SD: VO2peak = 65.0 ± 4.4 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1)) completed three 1-h performance runs separated by 1 wk. In random order, runners ingested either a 8-mL·kg(-1) body mass of either a 6.4% carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (CHO) or a placebo solution (P) 30 min before or a 2-mL·kg(-1) body mass at 15-min intervals throughout the 1-h run. On a separate occasion, runners mouth rinsed (R) a 6.4% CHO, i.e., without ingestion, at the same times as in the ingestion trials. RESULTS:Total distances covered in the CHO, P, and R trials were 14,515 ± 756, 14,190 ± 800, and 14,283 ± 758 m, respectively. Runners covered 320 m more (90% confidence interval = 140-510 m, P = 0.01) during the CHO trial compared with the P trial and 230 m more (90% confidence interval = 83-380 m, P = 0.019) in comparison with the R trial. There was no difference in n distance covered between the R and P trials (P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: A greater distance was covered after the mouth rinse and ingestion of a 6.4% CHO during a 1-h performance run than when mouth rinsing the same solution or mouth rinsing followed by the ingestion of the same volume of a placebo solution.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of ingesting versus mouth rinsing a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution on 1-h running performance. METHODS: After a 14- to 15-h fast, 10 endurance-trained male runners (mean ± SD: VO2peak = 65.0 ± 4.4 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1)) completed three 1-h performance runs separated by 1 wk. In random order, runners ingested either a 8-mL·kg(-1) body mass of either a 6.4% carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (CHO) or a placebo solution (P) 30 min before or a 2-mL·kg(-1) body mass at 15-min intervals throughout the 1-h run. On a separate occasion, runners mouth rinsed (R) a 6.4% CHO, i.e., without ingestion, at the same times as in the ingestion trials. RESULTS: Total distances covered in the CHO, P, and R trials were 14,515 ± 756, 14,190 ± 800, and 14,283 ± 758 m, respectively. Runners covered 320 m more (90% confidence interval = 140-510 m, P = 0.01) during the CHO trial compared with the P trial and 230 m more (90% confidence interval = 83-380 m, P = 0.019) in comparison with the R trial. There was no difference in n distance covered between the R and P trials (P = 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: A greater distance was covered after the mouth rinse and ingestion of a 6.4% CHO during a 1-h performance run than when mouth rinsing the same solution or mouth rinsing followed by the ingestion of the same volume of a placebo solution.
Authors: Chad M Kerksick; Colin D Wilborn; Michael D Roberts; Abbie Smith-Ryan; Susan M Kleiner; Ralf Jäger; Rick Collins; Mathew Cooke; Jaci N Davis; Elfego Galvan; Mike Greenwood; Lonnie M Lowery; Robert Wildman; Jose Antonio; Richard B Kreider Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Thays de Ataide e Silva; Maria Eduarda Di Cavalcanti Alves de Souza; Jamile Ferro de Amorim; Christos G Stathis; Carol Góis Leandro; Adriano Eduardo Lima-Silva Journal: Nutrients Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Eric K O'Neal; Sylvia P Poulos; Jonathan E Wingo; Mark T Richardson; Phillip A Bishop Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 5.150