Literature DB >> 20689185

Aligning protein sequence and analysing substitution pattern using a class-specific matrix.

Hai Song Xu1, Wen Ke Ren, Xiao Hui Liu, Xiao Qin Li.   

Abstract

Aligning protein sequences using a score matrix has became a routine but valuable method in modern biological research. However, alignment in the 'twilight zone' remains an open issue. It is feasible and necessary to construct a new score matrix as more protein structures are resolved. Three structural class-specific score matrices (all-alpha, all-beta and alpha/beta) were constructed based on the structure alignment of low identity proteins of the corresponding structural classes. The class-specific score matrices were significantly better than a structure-derived matrix (HSDM) and three other generalized matrices (BLOSUM30, BLOSUM60 and Gonnet250) in alignment performance tests. The optimized gap penalties presented here also promote alignment performance. The results indicate that different protein classes have distinct amino acid substitution patterns, and an amino acid score matrix should be constructed based on different structural classes. The class-specific score matrices could also be used in profile construction to improve homology detection.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20689185     DOI: 10.1007/s12038-010-0033-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci        ISSN: 0250-5991            Impact factor:   1.826


  37 in total

1.  PHAT: a transmembrane-specific substitution matrix. Predicted hydrophobic and transmembrane.

Authors:  P C Ng; J G Henikoff; S Henikoff
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Structure-derived substitution matrices for alignment of distantly related sequences.

Authors:  A Prlić; F S Domingues; M J Sippl
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2000-08

3.  Fold-specific substitution matrices for protein classification.

Authors:  R B Vilim; R M Cunningham; B Lu; P Kheradpour; F J Stevens
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Exhaustive matching of the entire protein sequence database.

Authors:  G H Gonnet; M A Cohen; S A Benner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Methods for assessing the statistical significance of molecular sequence features by using general scoring schemes.

Authors:  S Karlin; S F Altschul
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins.

Authors:  M Gribskov; A D McLachlan; D Eisenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  An assessment of amino acid exchange matrices in aligning protein sequences: the twilight zone revisited.

Authors:  G Vogt; T Etzold; P Argos
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  A structural basis for sequence comparisons. An evaluation of scoring methodologies.

Authors:  M S Johnson; J P Overington
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Hidden Markov models in computational biology. Applications to protein modeling.

Authors:  A Krogh; M Brown; I S Mian; K Sjölander; D Haussler
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-02-04       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Detection of conserved segments in proteins: iterative scanning of sequence databases with alignment blocks.

Authors:  R L Tatusov; S F Altschul; E V Koonin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Substitution scoring matrices for proteins - An overview.

Authors:  Rakesh Trivedi; Hampapathalu Adimurthy Nagarajaram
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Domain enhanced lookup time accelerated BLAST.

Authors:  Grzegorz M Boratyn; Alejandro A Schäffer; Richa Agarwala; Stephen F Altschul; David J Lipman; Thomas L Madden
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.540

3.  SDS, a structural disruption score for assessment of missense variant deleteriousness.

Authors:  Thanawadee Preeprem; Greg Gibson
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 4.599

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.