Nancy C Brahm1, Lynn L Yeager, Mark D Fox, Kevin C Farmer, Tony A Palmer. 1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Clinical and Administrative Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma, 4502 East 41st Street, Tulsa, OK 74135-2512, USA. nancy-brahm@ouhsc.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: The implications of potential false-positive urine drug screen (UDS) results for patients receiving commonly prescribed medications were evaluated. SUMMARY: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify false-positive UDSs associated with all clinic formulary medications, as well as common nonprescription medications. The references of each report describing a medication whose use was associated with false-positive UDS results were also reviewed. If a class effect was suspected, additional agents in the category were searched. A total of 25 reports of false-positive UDS results were identified. Categories of medications included antihistamines, antidepressants, antibiotics, analgesics, antipsychotics, and nonprescription agents. Reports of false-positive results were found for the following formulary and nonprescription medications: brompheniramine, bupropion, chlorpromazine, clomipramine, dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, doxylamine, ibuprofen, naproxen, promethazine, quetiapine, quinolones (ofloxacin and gatifloxacin), ranitidine, sertraline, thioridazine, trazodone, venlafaxine, verapamil, and a nonprescription nasal inhaler. False-positive results for amphetamine and methamphetamine were the most commonly reported. False-positive results for methadone, opioids, phencyclidine, barbiturates, cannabinoids, and benzodiazepines were also reported in patients taking commonly used medications. The most commonly used tests to screen urine for drugs of abuse are immunoassays, even though false-positive results for drugs of abuse have been reported with a number of these rapid-screening products. Results from such tests should be confirmed using additional analytical methods, including gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. CONCLUSION: A number of routinely prescribed medications have been associated with triggering false-positive UDS results. Verification of the test results with a different screening test or additional analytical tests should be performed to avoid adverse consequences for the patients.
PURPOSE: The implications of potential false-positive urine drug screen (UDS) results for patients receiving commonly prescribed medications were evaluated. SUMMARY: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify false-positive UDSs associated with all clinic formulary medications, as well as common nonprescription medications. The references of each report describing a medication whose use was associated with false-positive UDS results were also reviewed. If a class effect was suspected, additional agents in the category were searched. A total of 25 reports of false-positive UDS results were identified. Categories of medications included antihistamines, antidepressants, antibiotics, analgesics, antipsychotics, and nonprescription agents. Reports of false-positive results were found for the following formulary and nonprescription medications: brompheniramine, bupropion, chlorpromazine, clomipramine, dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, doxylamine, ibuprofen, naproxen, promethazine, quetiapine, quinolones (ofloxacin and gatifloxacin), ranitidine, sertraline, thioridazine, trazodone, venlafaxine, verapamil, and a nonprescription nasal inhaler. False-positive results for amphetamine and methamphetamine were the most commonly reported. False-positive results for methadone, opioids, phencyclidine, barbiturates, cannabinoids, and benzodiazepines were also reported in patients taking commonly used medications. The most commonly used tests to screen urine for drugs of abuse are immunoassays, even though false-positive results for drugs of abuse have been reported with a number of these rapid-screening products. Results from such tests should be confirmed using additional analytical methods, including gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. CONCLUSION: A number of routinely prescribed medications have been associated with triggering false-positive UDS results. Verification of the test results with a different screening test or additional analytical tests should be performed to avoid adverse consequences for the patients.
Authors: A M Kolbach-Mandel; N S Mandel; S R Cohen; J G Kleinman; F Ahmed; I C Mandel; J A Wesson Journal: Urolithiasis Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Elisabeth Fabian; Christian Madl; Sabine Horn; Peter Kornprat; Ralph Maderthaner; Ariane Aigelsreiter; Robert Krause; Peter Fickert; Guenter J Krejs Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Eungjae Kim; Brian Patrick Murray; Maryam Salehi; Tim P Moran; Joseph E Carpenter; David D Koch; James C Ritchie; Joanna M Schindler; Brent W Morgan Journal: J Med Toxicol Date: 2019-07-01
Authors: Quan M Bui; Larry A Allen; Andrew A Monte; Robert L Page; Colleen K McIlvennan Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 10.247