Literature DB >> 20689123

Commonly prescribed medications and potential false-positive urine drug screens.

Nancy C Brahm1, Lynn L Yeager, Mark D Fox, Kevin C Farmer, Tony A Palmer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The implications of potential false-positive urine drug screen (UDS) results for patients receiving commonly prescribed medications were evaluated.
SUMMARY: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify false-positive UDSs associated with all clinic formulary medications, as well as common nonprescription medications. The references of each report describing a medication whose use was associated with false-positive UDS results were also reviewed. If a class effect was suspected, additional agents in the category were searched. A total of 25 reports of false-positive UDS results were identified. Categories of medications included antihistamines, antidepressants, antibiotics, analgesics, antipsychotics, and nonprescription agents. Reports of false-positive results were found for the following formulary and nonprescription medications: brompheniramine, bupropion, chlorpromazine, clomipramine, dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, doxylamine, ibuprofen, naproxen, promethazine, quetiapine, quinolones (ofloxacin and gatifloxacin), ranitidine, sertraline, thioridazine, trazodone, venlafaxine, verapamil, and a nonprescription nasal inhaler. False-positive results for amphetamine and methamphetamine were the most commonly reported. False-positive results for methadone, opioids, phencyclidine, barbiturates, cannabinoids, and benzodiazepines were also reported in patients taking commonly used medications. The most commonly used tests to screen urine for drugs of abuse are immunoassays, even though false-positive results for drugs of abuse have been reported with a number of these rapid-screening products. Results from such tests should be confirmed using additional analytical methods, including gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
CONCLUSION: A number of routinely prescribed medications have been associated with triggering false-positive UDS results. Verification of the test results with a different screening test or additional analytical tests should be performed to avoid adverse consequences for the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20689123     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp090477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  21 in total

1.  Guaifenesin stone matrix proteomics: a protocol for identifying proteins critical to stone formation.

Authors:  A M Kolbach-Mandel; N S Mandel; S R Cohen; J G Kleinman; F Ahmed; I C Mandel; J A Wesson
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Clinical-pathological conference series from the Medical University of Graz: case no. 151: 19-year-old student from Albania with emergency admission due to shock.

Authors:  Elisabeth Fabian; Christian Madl; Sabine Horn; Peter Kornprat; Ralph Maderthaner; Ariane Aigelsreiter; Robert Krause; Peter Fickert; Guenter J Krejs
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Influence of drug use on morbidity and mortality in heatstroke.

Authors:  Michael Levine; Frank LoVecchio; Anne-Michelle Ruha; Gregory Chu; Pedro Roque
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2012-09

4.  ACMT Position Statement: Interpretation of Urine for Tetrahydrocannabinol Metabolites.

Authors:  Nicholas Connors; Michael J Kosnett; Ken Kulig; Lewis S Nelson; Andrew I Stolbach
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2020-01-14

5.  Does Lidocaine Cause False Positive Results on Cocaine Urine Drug Screen?

Authors:  Eungjae Kim; Brian Patrick Murray; Maryam Salehi; Tim P Moran; Joseph E Carpenter; David D Koch; James C Ritchie; Joanna M Schindler; Brent W Morgan
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2019-07-01

6.  How often do false-positive phencyclidine urine screens occur with use of common medications?

Authors:  Arvind Rengarajan; Michael E Mullins
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.467

7.  Amphetamine-positive urine drug screens in the setting of mexiletine use: A case series.

Authors:  Quan M Bui; Larry A Allen; Andrew A Monte; Robert L Page; Colleen K McIlvennan
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Epidemic of illicit drug use, mechanisms of action/addiction and stroke as a health hazard.

Authors:  Katherine Esse; Marco Fossati-Bellani; Angela Traylor; Sheryl Martin-Schild
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Amphetamine positive urine toxicology screen secondary to atomoxetine.

Authors:  Joshua L Fenderson; Amy N Stratton; Jennifer S Domingo; Gerald O Matthews; Christopher D Tan
Journal:  Case Rep Psychiatry       Date:  2013-01-30

10.  Impact of Recent Methamphetamine Use on Vancomycin Clearance.

Authors:  S Andrea Laguado; Nina Vadiei; Kateryna Yenina
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  2020-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.