Literature DB >> 20688894

Respiratory muscle pressures in non-CF bronchiectasis: repeatability and reliability.

F Moran1, A Piper, J S Elborn, J M Bradley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Respiratory muscle strength is used diagnostically in clinical practice and as an outcome measure in clinical trials in various chronic lung diseases. There is limited data on its repeatability in people with non-CF bronchiectasis. The aim of the present study was to assess the repeatability of maximal inspiratory (P( I)max) and expiratory pressures (P(E)max) in a group of patients with stable, moderate-to-severe non-CF bronchiectasis.
METHODS: Twenty participants with stable moderate-to-severe non-CF bronchiectasis were recruited. Respiratory muscle strength measurements (three maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures) were made on 2 separate days. A standard protocol was used, including practice tests, before obtaining three technically acceptable and reproducible readings with a difference of 10% or less between values. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00487149.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the non-CF bronchiectasis group was 63 (9) years. Maximal inspiratory pressures were repeatable with mean (SD) for highest P(I)max, Test 1 and Test 2, 75.90 (20) and 79.40 (19) cmH(2)O, and limits of agreement (mean difference +/- 2SD) -3.50 +/- 20 cmH(2)O, (p = 0.14). Maximal expiratory pressures differed significantly with mean (SD) for highest P(E)max, Test 1 and Test 2, 102.25 (27) and 112.30 (32) cmH(2)O, and limits of agreement (mean difference +/- 2SD) -10.10 +/- 35 cmH(2)O, (p = 0.02). The intraclass correlation coefficient (95% CI) for highest P(I)max and P(E)max was 0.93 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.97) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.96), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Maximal inspiratory pressure measurements were repeatable during a period of clinical stability in moderate-to-severe non-CF bronchiectasis, suggesting this may be a useful outcome measure in non-CF bronchiectasis. Once a baseline has been established, a second visit is not required. P(E)max was not a repeatable measure and further study is necessary to ascertain how much practice testing is required to obtain an accurate value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20688894     DOI: 10.1177/1479972310375595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chron Respir Dis        ISSN: 1479-9723            Impact factor:   2.444


  5 in total

Review 1.  Nutritional status and muscle dysfunction in chronic respiratory diseases: stable phase versus acute exacerbations.

Authors:  Joaquim Gea; Antoni Sancho-Muñoz; Roberto Chalela
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Exercise training for bronchiectasis.

Authors:  Annemarie L Lee; Carla S Gordon; Christian R Osadnik
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-06

3.  Reliability and validity of the test of incremental respiratory endurance measures of inspiratory muscle performance in COPD.

Authors:  Michael A Campos; Lawrence P Cahalin; Magno F Formiga; Kathryn E Roach; Isabel Vital; Gisel Urdaneta; Kira Balestrini; Rafael A Calderon-Candelario
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-05-15

4.  Extrapulmonary features of bronchiectasis: muscle function, exercise capacity, fatigue, and health status.

Authors:  Ozge Ozalp; Deniz Inal-Ince; Ebru Calik; Naciye Vardar-Yagli; Melda Saglam; Sema Savci; Hulya Arikan; Meral Bosnak-Guclu; Lutfi Coplu
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2012-06-11

5.  The Effect of a High-Intensity PrO2Fit Inspiratory Muscle Training Intervention on Physiological and Psychological Health in Adults with Bronchiectasis: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Jessica L McCreery; Kelly A Mackintosh; Rebekah Mills-Bennett; Melitta A McNarry
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.