OBJECTIVE: We examined the effects of presentation medium on immediate and delayed recall of information and assessed the effect of giving patients take-home materials after initial presentations. METHODS: Primary-care patients received video-based, print-based or no asthma education about asthma symptoms and triggers and then answered knowledge-based questions. Print participants and half the video participants received take-home print materials. A week later, available participants completed the knowledge assessment again. RESULTS: Participants receiving either intervention outperformed controls on immediate and delayed assessments (p<0.001). For symptom-related information, immediate performance did not significantly differ between print and video participants. A week later, receiving take-home print predicted better performance (p<0.05), as did self-reported review among recipients of take-home print (p<0.01). For content about inhaler usage, although video watchers outperformed print participants immediately after seeing the materials (p<0.001), a week later these two groups' performance did not significantly differ. Among participants given take-home materials, review predicted marginally better recall (p=0.06). CONCLUSION:Video and print interventions can promote recall of health-related information. Additionally, reviewable materials, if they are utilized, may improve retention. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: When creating educational tools, providers should consider how long information must be retained, its content, and the feasibility of providing tangible supporting materials. Copyright (c) 2010. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: We examined the effects of presentation medium on immediate and delayed recall of information and assessed the effect of giving patients take-home materials after initial presentations. METHODS: Primary-care patients received video-based, print-based or no asthma education about asthma symptoms and triggers and then answered knowledge-based questions. Print participants and half the video participants received take-home print materials. A week later, available participants completed the knowledge assessment again. RESULTS:Participants receiving either intervention outperformed controls on immediate and delayed assessments (p<0.001). For symptom-related information, immediate performance did not significantly differ between print and video participants. A week later, receiving take-home print predicted better performance (p<0.05), as did self-reported review among recipients of take-home print (p<0.01). For content about inhaler usage, although video watchers outperformed print participants immediately after seeing the materials (p<0.001), a week later these two groups' performance did not significantly differ. Among participants given take-home materials, review predicted marginally better recall (p=0.06). CONCLUSION: Video and print interventions can promote recall of health-related information. Additionally, reviewable materials, if they are utilized, may improve retention. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: When creating educational tools, providers should consider how long information must be retained, its content, and the feasibility of providing tangible supporting materials. Copyright (c) 2010. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Authors: Hanna M Seidling; Anette Lampert; Kristina Lohmann; Julia T Schiele; Alexander J F Send; Diana Witticke; Walter E Haefeli Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Rachel O'Conor; Kimberly Muellers; Marina Arvanitis; Daniel P Vicencio; Michael S Wolf; Juan P Wisnivesky; Alex D Federman Journal: Respir Med Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: Rachel O'Conor; Michael S Wolf; Samuel G Smith; Melissa Martynenko; Daniel P Vicencio; Mary Sano; Juan P Wisnivesky; Alex D Federman Journal: Chest Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Laura M Curtis; William Revelle; Katherine Waite; Elizabeth A H Wilson; David M Condon; Elizabeth Bojarski; Denise C Park; David W Baker; Michael S Wolf Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2014-11-06
Authors: Danielle M McCarthy; Katherine R Waite; Laura M Curtis; Kirsten G Engel; David W Baker; Michael S Wolf Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Neal J Meropol; Yu-Ning Wong; Terrance Albrecht; Sharon Manne; Suzanne M Miller; Anne Lederman Flamm; Al Bowen Benson; Joanne Buzaglo; Michael Collins; Brian Egleston; Linda Fleisher; Michael Katz; Tyler G Kinzy; Tasnuva M Liu; Seunghee Margevicius; Dawn M Miller; David Poole; Nancy Roach; Eric Ross; Mark D Schluchter Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 44.544