Literature DB >> 20688445

Carbon fibre and nitinol needles for MRI-guided interventions: first in vitro and in vivo application.

Christoph Thomas1, Hanne Wojtczyk, Hansjörg Rempp, Stephan Clasen, Marius Horger, Christoph von Lassberg, Jan Fritz, Claus D Claussen, Philippe L Pereira.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the artefact properties of a MR-compatible carbon fibre needle with a nitinol mandrin in vitro and to report first clinical experiences.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In vitro, the carbon fibre/nitinol needle was imaged at different angles against the main magnetic field (1.5T open bore magnet). A gradient echo MR fluoroscopy sequence (GRE: TR 9.3 ms, TE 3.12 ms, bandwidth 200 Hz/pixel, flip-angle 12°) and a fast turbo spin echo sequence (FSE: TR 412 ms, TE 9.7 ms, bandwidth 200 Hz/pixel, flip-angle 150°) were used. Artefact width, needle intensity contrast and needle tip location errors were assessed. In vivo, lumbar periradicular corticosteroid injections and one sclerotherapy were performed with carbon fibre needles (10 procedures) and with titanium alloy needles (2 procedures). The artefact sizes and contrasts were measured.
RESULTS: In vitro, artefact diameters of the carbon fibre needle ranged from 3.3 to 4.6 mm, contrasts from 0.11 to 0.52, with larger artefact contrasts and widths with the GRE sequence. Needle tip location errors of -2.1 to -2.8 mm were observed. Decreasing angles to the main field lead to smaller artefacts. In vivo, the carbon fibre/nitinol needle produced smaller artefacts (mean width FSE/GRE: 2.8mm/4.6mm) with lower contrast (0.30-0.42) than the titanium alloy needle (mean width FSE/GRE: 4.1 mm/7.5 mm, contrast 0.60-0.73).
CONCLUSIONS: The carbon fibre/nitinol needle is useful for performing MR-guided interventions at 1.5T, producing more subtle artefacts than a titanium alloy needle, but with an incomplete depiction and thus inaccurate localization of the needle tip.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20688445     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  4 in total

1.  In vitro artefact assessment of a new MR-compatible microwave antenna and a standard MR-compatible radiofrequency ablation electrode for tumour ablation.

Authors:  Rüdiger Hoffmann; Hansjörg Rempp; Frank Eibofner; David-Emanuel Keßler; Gunnar Blumenstock; Jakob Weiß; Philippe L Pereira; Konstantin Nikolaou; Stephan Clasen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  MRI-guided sacroiliac joint injections in children and adults: current practice and future developments.

Authors:  Danoob Dalili; Amanda Isaac; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 2.128

3.  Assessment of a carbon fibre MRI flatbed insert for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Maysam M Jafar; Jonathan Reeves; Matthieu A Ruthven; Christopher J Dean; Niall D MacDougall; Arthur T Tucker; Marc E Miquel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Artifact reduction of coaxial needles in magnetic resonance imaging-guided abdominal interventions at 1.5 T: a phantom study.

Authors:  Vanessa Franziska Schmidt; Federica Arnone; Olaf Dietrich; Max Seidensticker; Marco Armbruster; Jens Ricke; Philipp Maximilian Kazmierczak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.