Literature DB >> 20688388

Differences between in vitro viability and differentiation and in vivo bone-forming efficacy of human mesenchymal stem cells cultured on PCL-TCP scaffolds.

Bina Rai1, Jane L Lin, Zophia X H Lim, Robert E Guldberg, Dietmar W Hutmacher, Simon M Cool.   

Abstract

Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) possess great therapeutic potential for the treatment of bone disease and fracture non-union. Too often however, in vitro evidence alone of the interaction between hMSCs and the biomaterial of choice is used as justification for continued development of the material into the clinic. Clearly for hMSC-based regenerative medicine to be successful for the treatment of orthopaedic trauma, it is crucial to transplant hMSCs with a suitable carrier that facilitates their survival, optimal proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in vitro and in vivo. This motivated us to evaluate the use of polycaprolactone-20% tricalcium phosphate (PCL-TCP) scaffolds produced by fused deposition modeling for the delivery of hMSCs. When hMSCs were cultured on the PCL-TCP scaffolds and imaged by a combination of phase contrast, scanning electron and confocal laser microscopy, we observed five distinct stages of colonization over a 21-day period that were characterized by cell attachment, spreading, cellular bridging, the formation of a dense cellular mass and the accumulation of a mineralized extracellular matrix when induced with osteogenic stimulants. Having established that PCL-TCP scaffolds are able to support hMSC proliferation and osteogenic differentiation, we next tested the in vivo efficacy of hMSC-loaded PCL-TCP scaffolds in nude rat critical-sized femoral defects. We found that fluorescently labeled hMSCs survived in the defect site for up to 3 weeks post-transplantation. However, only 50% of the femoral defects treated with hMSCs responded favorably as determined by new bone volume. As such, we show that verification of hMSC viability and differentiation in vitro is not sufficient to predict the efficacy of transplanted stem cells to consistently promote bone formation in orthotopic defects in vivo. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20688388     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  36 in total

Review 1.  Leveraging "raw materials" as building blocks and bioactive signals in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Amanda N Renth; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Heparan sulfate enhances the self-renewal and therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells from human adult bone marrow.

Authors:  Torben Helledie; Christian Dombrowski; Bina Rai; Zophia X H Lim; Ian Lee Hock Hin; David A Rider; Gary S Stein; Wanjin Hong; Andre J van Wijnen; James H Hui; Victor Nurcombe; Simon M Cool
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  In vivo bone regeneration using tubular perfusion system bioreactor cultured nanofibrous scaffolds.

Authors:  Andrew B Yeatts; Sanne K Both; Wanxun Yang; Hamdan S Alghamdi; Fang Yang; John P Fisher; John A Jansen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Developmental-like bone regeneration by human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal cells.

Authors:  Liisa T Kuhn; Yongxing Liu; Nolan L Boyd; James E Dennis; Xi Jiang; Xiaonan Xin; Lyndon F Charles; Liping Wang; H Leonardo Aguila; David W Rowe; Alexander C Lichtler; A Jon Goldberg
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  Concise review: cell-based strategies in bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Jinling Ma; Sanne K Both; Fang Yang; Fu-Zhai Cui; Juli Pan; Gert J Meijer; John A Jansen; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 6.  Application of selected scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sepanta Hosseinpour; Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie; Maryam Rezai Rad; Mohammad Taghi Baghani; Saeed Reza Motamedian; Arash Khojasteh
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-02-13

7.  RNA interfering molecule delivery from in situ forming biodegradable hydrogels for enhancement of bone formation in rat calvarial bone defects.

Authors:  Minh K Nguyen; Oju Jeon; Phuong N Dang; Cong T Huynh; Davood Varghai; Hooman Riazi; Alexandra McMillan; Samuel Herberg; Eben Alsberg
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  Effect of heparin on the biological properties and molecular signature of human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Ling Ling; Emily T Camilleri; Torben Helledie; Rebekah M Samsonraj; Drew M Titmarsh; Ren Jie Chua; Oliver Dreesen; Christian Dombrowski; David A Rider; Mario Galindo; Ian Lee; Wanjin Hong; James H Hui; Victor Nurcombe; Andre J van Wijnen; Simon M Cool
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 3.688

9.  Combined effect of three types of biophysical stimuli for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Kyung Shin Kang; Jung Min Hong; Young Hun Jeong; Young-Joon Seol; Woon-Jae Yong; Jong-Won Rhie; Dong-Woo Cho
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  In vivo gene activity of human mesenchymal stem cells after scaffold-mediated local transplantation.

Authors:  Soon Jung Hwang; Tae Hyung Cho; In Sook Kim
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.