Literature DB >> 20687276

Effects of ultrasound-induced inertial cavitation on enzymatic thrombolysis.

Yueh-Hsun Chuang1, Po-Wen Cheng, Szu-Chia Chen, Jia-Ling Ruan, Pai-Chi Li.   

Abstract

Cavitation induced by ultrasound enhances enzymatic fibrinolysis by increasing the transport of reactants. However, the effects of cavitation need to be fully understood before sonothrombolysis can be applied clinically. In order to understand the underlying mechanisms, we examined the effects of combining ultrasound, microbubbles and thrombolytic enzymes on thrombolysis. First, we evaluated the relations between inertial cavitation and the reduction in the weight of a blood clot. Inertial cavitation was varied by changing the amplitude and duration of the transmitted acoustic wave as well as the concentration of microbubbles used to induce cavitation. Second, we studied the combined effects of streptokinase and inertial cavitation on thrombolysis. The results show that inertial cavitation increases the weight reduction of a blood clot by up to 33.9%. With linear regression fitting, the measured differential inertial cavitation dose and the weight reduction had a correlation coefficient of 0.66. Microscopically, enzymatic thrombolysis effects manifest as multiple large cavities within the clot that are uniformly distributed on the side exposed to ultrasound. This suggests that inertial cavitation plays an important role in producing cavities, while microjetting of the microbubbles induces pits on the clot surface. These observations preliminarily demonstrate the clinical potential of sonothrombolysis. The use of the differential inertial cavitation dose as an indicator of blood clot weight loss for controlled sonothrombolysis is also possible and will be further explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20687276     DOI: 10.1177/016173461003200202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Imaging        ISSN: 0161-7346            Impact factor:   1.578


  9 in total

1.  Volumetric quantification of in vitro sonothrombolysis with microbubbles using high-resolution optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jong S Kim; Jonathan E Leeman; Larry Kagemann; Francois T H Yu; Xucai Chen; John J Pacella; Joel S Schuman; Flordeliza S Villanueva; Kang Kim
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 2.  Sonothrombolysis.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Guillaume Bouchoux; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Examining the Influence of Low-Dose Tissue Plasminogen Activator on Microbubble-Mediated Forward-Viewing Intravascular Sonothrombolysis.

Authors:  Leela Goel; Huaiyu Wu; Howuk Kim; Bohua Zhang; Jinwook Kim; Paul A Dayton; Zhen Xu; Xiaoning Jiang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Shaken and stirred: mechanisms of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Matthew J Gruber; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Quantitative Frequency-Domain Passive Cavitation Imaging.

Authors:  Kevin J Haworth; Kenneth B Bader; Kyle T Rich; Christy K Holland; T Douglas Mast
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Molecular mechanisms of the effect of ultrasound on the fibrinolysis of clots.

Authors:  I N Chernysh; C E Everbach; P K Purohit; J W Weisel
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.824

7.  The ultrasound contrast imaging properties of lipid microbubbles loaded with urokinase in dog livers and their thrombolytic effects when combined with low-frequency ultrasound in vitro.

Authors:  Shu-Ting Ren; Xiao-Ning Kang; Yi-Ran Liao; Wei Wang; Hong Ai; Li-Na Chen; Hui-Ting Luo; Rong-Guo Fu; Li-Fang Tan; Xin-Liang Shen; Bing Wang
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Accelerated sonothrombolysis with Definity in a xenographic porcine cerebral thromboembolism model.

Authors:  Robert T Kleven; Kunal B Karani; Nicole Hilvert; Samantha M Ford; Karla P Mercado-Shekhar; John M Racadio; Marepalli B Rao; Todd A Abruzzo; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The promising shadow of microbubble over medical sciences: from fighting wide scope of prevalence disease to cancer eradication.

Authors:  Ali Jangjou; Amir Hossein Meisami; Kazem Jamali; Mohammad Hadi Niakan; Milad Abbasi; Mostafa Shafiee; Majid Salehi; Ahmad Hosseinzadeh; Ali Mohammad Amani; Ahmad Vaez
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 8.410

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.