Literature DB >> 20687196

Can health beliefs help in explaining attendance to follow-up care? The Swiss childhood cancer survivor study.

Gisela Michel1, Claudia E Kuehni, Cornelia E Rebholz, Karin Zimmermann, Christine Eiser, Corina S Rueegg, Nicolas X von der Weid.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Improved treatment has increased the survival of childhood cancer patients in recent decades, but follow-up care is recommended to detect and treat late effects. We investigated relationships between health beliefs and follow-up attendance in adult childhood cancer survivors.
METHODS: Childhood cancer survivors aged younger than 16 years when diagnosed between 1976 and 2003, who had survived for more than 5 years and were currently aged 20+ years, received a postal questionnaire. We asked survivors whether they attended follow-up in the past year. Concepts from the Health Belief Model (perceived susceptibility and severity of future late effects, potential benefits and barriers to follow-up, general health value and cues to action) were assessed. Medical information was extracted from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry.
RESULTS: Of 1075 survivors (response rate 72.3%), 250 (23.3%) still attended regular follow-up care. In unadjusted analyses, all health belief concepts were significantly associated with follow-up (p<0.05). Adjusting for other health beliefs, demographic, and medical variables, only barriers (OR=0.59; 95%CI: 0.43-0.82) remained significant. Younger survivors, those with lower educational background, diagnosed at an older age, treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or bone marrow transplantation and with a relapse were more likely to attend follow-up care.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that more survivors at high risk of cancer- and treatment-related late effects attend follow-up care in Switzerland. Patient-perceived barriers hinder attendance even after accounting for medical variables. Information about the potential effectiveness and value of follow-up needs to be available to increase the attendance among childhood cancer survivors. 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20687196     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  5 in total

1.  Patterns and predictors of survivorship clinic attendance in a population-based sample of pediatric and young adult childhood cancer survivors.

Authors:  Daniel J Zheng; Kyaw Sint; Hannah-Rose Mitchell; Nina S Kadan-Lottick
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Multilevel socioeconomic effects on quality of life in adolescent and young adult survivors of leukemia and lymphoma.

Authors:  Erin E Kent; Leonard S Sender; Rebecca A Morris; Timothy J Grigsby; Michael J Montoya; Argyrios Ziogas; Hoda Anton-Culver
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Medical Follow-Up in Long-Term Childhood Cancer Survivors: What Are the Reasons for Non-Attendance?

Authors:  Mareike Ernst; Elmar Brähler; Jörg Faber; Philipp S Wild; Hiltrud Merzenich; Manfred E Beutel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-14

4.  Childhood cancer survivorship care: A qualitative study of healthcare providers' professional preferences.

Authors:  Jordana K McLoone; Weihan Chen; Claire E Wakefield; Karen Johnston; Rachael Bell; Elysia Thornton-Benko; Richard J Cohn; Christina Signorelli
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Follow-up programs for childhood cancer survivors in Europe: a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Stefan Essig; Roderick Skinner; Nicolas X von der Weid; Claudia E Kuehni; Gisela Michel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.