Literature DB >> 20687138

Cued platform training reveals early development of directional responding among preweanling rats in the Morris water task.

Katherine G Akers1, Felicha T Candelaria-Cook, James P Rice, Travis E Johnson, Derek A Hamilton.   

Abstract

Previous studies on the ontogeny of spatial learning report that rats younger than 19-21 days of age are incapable of learning the location of a platform relative to distal cues in the Morris water task. Here, we manipulated the spatial relationship of a cued platform to the pool and the distal visual room cues to investigate whether distal cues can control navigation among 16- to 24-day-old rats. Rats were trained to navigate to a cued platform in a rich distal cue environment. During critical test trials, the pool was shifted to a different, overlapping position and the cued platform was placed either in the same absolute location in the room or the same relative location in the pool as during training. Rats aged 17 days and older exhibited a disruption in performance when the cued platform was in the absolute location but not the relative location, indicating that rats had learned the direction of the cued platform within the distal cue environment. These observations indicate that (1) information acquired from distal room cues influences navigation as early as 17 days of age, (2) this distal cue information is preferentially used to guide navigation in a particular direction rather than to a precise place in the room, and (3) the directional nature of the influence of distal cues on navigation is invariant across development.
© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20687138     DOI: 10.1002/dev.20480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychobiol        ISSN: 0012-1630            Impact factor:   3.038


  8 in total

1.  Lesions of the dorsal tegmental nuclei disrupt control of navigation by distal landmarks in cued, directional, and place variants of the Morris water task.

Authors:  Benjamin J Clark; James P Rice; Katherine G Akers; Felicha T Candelaria-Cook; Jeffrey S Taube; Derek A Hamilton
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Determinants of novel object and location recognition during development.

Authors:  S A Jablonski; W B Schreiber; S R Westbrook; L E Brennan; M E Stanton
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Emergence of spatial behavioral function and associated mossy fiber connectivity and c-Fos labeling patterns in the hippocampus of rats.

Authors:  Rachel Comba; Nicole Gervais; Dave Mumby; Matthew Holahan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-07-27

4.  Using the Morris water maze to assess spatial learning and memory in weanling mice.

Authors:  Christopher D Barnhart; Dongren Yang; Pamela J Lein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Developmental Aspects of Glucose and Calcium Availability on the Persistence of Memory Function Over the Lifespan.

Authors:  Matthew R Holahan; Niko Tzakis; Fernando A Oliveira
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 6.  The development of spatial behaviour and the hippocampal neural representation of space.

Authors:  Thomas J Wills; Laurenz Muessig; Francesca Cacucci
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Contextual and auditory fear conditioning continue to emerge during the periweaning period in rats.

Authors:  Michael A Burman; Kristen J Erickson; Alex L Deal; Rose E Jacobson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Vestibular activity and cognitive development in children: perspectives.

Authors:  Sylvette R Wiener-Vacher; Derek A Hamilton; Sidney I Wiener
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.