Literature DB >> 20686992

Development and validation of the Decision-Specific Reinvestment Scale.

Noel P Kinrade1, Robin C Jackson, Kelly J Ashford, Daniel T Bishop.   

Abstract

Items from the Reinvestment Scale were modified to create a decision-specific version of the scale. Principal components analysis of responses from 165 participants revealed one-, two-, three-, and four-factor solutions for the Decision-Specific Reinvestment Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis of responses from a second sample of 111 participants revealed that a 13-item two-factor solution showed the best fit. The first factor comprised six items referring to conscious monitoring of the process involved in making a decision, and was termed decision reinvestment. The second factor, decision rumination, comprised seven items related to focus on negative evaluations of previous poor decisions. In an initial assessment of predictive validity, Decision-Specific Reinvestment Scale scores of 59 skilled team sport players were found to be highly correlated with coaches' ratings of players' tendency to choke under pressure (r = 0.74), with high Decision-Specific Reinvestment Scale scores indicating greater susceptibility to poor decision-making under pressure. It was concluded that the Decision-Specific Reinvestment Scale highlights a performer's predisposition to engage in behaviours detrimental to performance under pressure, namely decision reinvestment and decision rumination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20686992     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2010.499439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  3 in total

1.  Design, Validation, and Reliability of an Observational Instrument for Technical and Tactical Actions in Singles Badminton.

Authors:  Gema Torres-Luque; Juan Carlos Blanca-Torres; José María Giménez-Egido; David Cabello-Manrique; Enrique Ortega-Toro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-10

Review 2.  Understanding a Player's Decision-Making Process in Team Sports: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence.

Authors:  Michael Ashford; Andrew Abraham; Jamie Poolton
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-17

3.  Evidence for Skill Level Differences in the Thought Processes of Golfers During High and Low Pressure Situations.

Authors:  Amy E Whitehead; Jamie A Taylor; Remco C J Polman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.