Literature DB >> 20686808

The role of hemorrhoidopexy in the management of 3rd degree hemorrhoids.

M G Pramateftakis1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hemorrhoidopathy is a very common benign surgical pathology. Hemorrhoids are divided into 4 stages, depending on symptoms and degree of prolapse. Hemorrhoidopexy is a technique developed for the treatment of 3rd degree hemorrhoids, but its application has been extended to the treatment of 4th degree hemorrhoids as well. Nevertheless, recent studies identify weaknesses of the PPH in the treatment of 4th degree hemorrhoids. PATIENTS: One hundred and twenty-six consecutive patients with 3rd degree hemorrhoids underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia with the patient in lithotomy position. A phosphate enema was given to the patient 2 h before the procedure, and cephalosporine and metronidazole were administered at anesthesia induction. Most patients were discharged the day after the operation. All patients were reassessed at 1, 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months after the procedure.
RESULTS: The mean operating time was 16.3 min. Of all patients, 5.8% complained of mild rectal pain for a post-operative period of 5-12 days, 5.8% developed post-operative urinary retention, managed with catheterization, 13.3% experienced fecal urgency while 5.8% experienced gas incontinence, which subsided 2-8 weeks from surgery. The mean hospital stay was 1.2 days. Most patients returned to daily activities within 2-5 days. Ninety-five percent of patients returned for their follow-up visits. Recurrence of the disease occurred in 8 patients (6.6%). It was managed conservatively in 2 patients, 3 underwent redo hemorrhoidopexy and 3 underwent classic hemorrhoidectomy.
CONCLUSION: According to our results, stapled hemorrhoidopexy seems to be a safe, pain-free and, in the long-term, effective technique for the treatment of 3rd degree hemorrhoids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20686808     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-010-0605-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  4 in total

Review 1.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy: a consensus position paper by an international working party - indications, contra-indications and technique.

Authors:  M L Corman; J-F Gravié; T Hager; M A Loudon; D Mascagni; P-O Nyström; F Seow-Choen; H Abcarian; P Marcello; E Weiss; A Longo
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for haemorrhoids in combination with lateral internal sphincterotomy for fissure-in-ano.

Authors:  I Kanellos; S Angelopoulos; E Zacharakis; D Kanellos; M G Pramateftakis; K Blouhos; D Betsis
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.745

3.  Stapled haemorrhoidectomy compared with Milligan-Morgan excision for the treatment of prolapsing haemorrhoids: a prospective study.

Authors:  I Goulimaris; I Kanellos; E Christoforidis; I Mantzoros; Ch Odisseos; D Betsis
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2002

4.  Long-term results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy for fourth-degree haemorrhoids: a prospective study with median follow-up of 6 years.

Authors:  E Zacharakis; D Kanellos; M G Pramateftakis; I Kanellos; S Angelopoulos; I Mantzoros; D Betsis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.781

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  The use of a detachable anvil enables an easier and safer stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  M G Pramateftakis; L Pavlidis; M Koumourtzis; N Sxisas; C Rampiadou
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes.

Authors:  P Giordano; P Nastro; A Davies; G Gravante
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 3.781

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.