Literature DB >> 20685919

Commentary: mouse genetic nomenclature. Standardization of strain, gene, and protein symbols.

J P Sundberg1, P N Schofield.   

Abstract

The use of standard nomenclatures for describing the strains, genes, and proteins of species is vital for the interpretation, archiving, analysis, and recovery of experimental data on the laboratory mouse. At a time when sharing of data and meta-analysis of experimental results is becoming a dominant mode of scientific investigation, failure to respect formal nomenclatures can cause confusion and errors and, in some cases, contribute to poor science. Here, the authors present the basic nomenclature rules for laboratory mice and explain how these rules should be applied to complex genetic manipulations and crosses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20685919      PMCID: PMC3039125          DOI: 10.1177/0300985810374837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Pathol        ISSN: 0300-9858            Impact factor:   2.221


  13 in total

1.  Ontologies: Formalising biological knowledge for bioinformatics.

Authors:  Jonathan Bard
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology.

Authors:  Olivier Bodenreider
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Ontologies in biology: design, applications and future challenges.

Authors:  Jonathan B L Bard; Seung Y Rhee
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Epicardial and corneal mineralization in clinically normal severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice.

Authors:  V P Meador; R D Tyler; M L Plunkett
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.221

5.  Theoretical and empirical issues for marker-assisted breeding of congenic mouse strains.

Authors:  P Markel; P Shu; C Ebeling; G A Carlson; D L Nagle; J S Smutko; K J Moore
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  The Human Phenotype Ontology: a tool for annotating and analyzing human hereditary disease.

Authors:  Peter N Robinson; Sebastian Köhler; Sebastian Bauer; Dominik Seelow; Denise Horn; Stefan Mundlos
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Annotating the human genome with Disease Ontology.

Authors:  John D Osborne; Jared Flatow; Michelle Holko; Simon M Lin; Warren A Kibbe; Lihua Julie Zhu; Maria I Danila; Gang Feng; Rex L Chisholm
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Bethesda proposals for classification of nonlymphoid hematopoietic neoplasms in mice.

Authors:  Scott C Kogan; Jerrold M Ward; Miriam R Anver; Jules J Berman; Cory Brayton; Robert D Cardiff; John S Carter; Sherri de Coronado; James R Downing; Torgny N Fredrickson; Diana C Haines; Alan W Harris; Nancy Lee Harris; Hiroshi Hiai; Elaine S Jaffe; Ian C M MacLennan; Pier Paolo Pandolfi; Paul K Pattengale; Archibald S Perkins; R Mark Simpson; Mark S Tuttle; Joanne F Wong; Herbert C Morse
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Integrating mouse anatomy and pathology ontologies into a phenotyping database: tools for data capture and training.

Authors:  John P Sundberg; Beth A Sundberg; Paul Schofield
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 2.957

10.  The Mammalian Phenotype Ontology as a tool for annotating, analyzing and comparing phenotypic information.

Authors:  Cynthia L Smith; Carroll-Ann W Goldsmith; Janan T Eppig
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Designing phenotyping studies for genetically engineered mice.

Authors:  C J Zeiss; J M Ward; H G Allore
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 2.221

Review 2.  A fish is not a mouse: understanding differences in background genetics is critical for reproducibility.

Authors:  Marcus J Crim; Christian Lawrence
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 12.625

3.  Reproducibility of histopathological findings in experimental pathology of the mouse: a sorry tail.

Authors:  Jerrold M Ward; Paul N Schofield; John P Sundberg
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 4.  Research-Relevant Conditions and Pathology of Laboratory Mice, Rats, Gerbils, Guinea Pigs, Hamsters, Naked Mole Rats, and Rabbits.

Authors:  Timothy K Cooper; David K Meyerholz; Amanda P Beck; Martha A Delaney; Alessandra Piersigilli; Teresa L Southard; Cory F Brayton
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 1.521

5.  Pathology Principles and Practices for Analysis of Animal Models.

Authors:  Sue E Knoblaugh; Tobias M Hohl; Krista M D La Perle
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2018-12-01

6.  Comparative study of fatty liver induced by methionine and choline-deficiency in C57BL/6N mice originating from three different sources.

Authors:  Sou Hyun Kim; Yong Lim; Ju Bin Park; Jae-Hwan Kwak; Keuk-Jun Kim; Joung-Hee Kim; HyunKeun Song; Joon-Yong Cho; Dae Youn Hwang; Kil Soo Kim; Young-Suk Jung
Journal:  Lab Anim Res       Date:  2017-06-30

Review 7.  Immune Relevant and Immune Deficient Mice: Options and Opportunities in Translational Research.

Authors:  Enrico Radaelli; Sara F Santagostino; Rani S Sellers; Cory F Brayton
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2018-12-31

8.  A γA-Crystallin Mouse Mutant Secc with Small Eye, Cataract and Closed Eyelid.

Authors:  Man Hei Cheng; Chung Nga Tam; Kwong Wai Choy; Wai Hung Tsang; Sze Lan Tsang; Chi Pui Pang; You Qiang Song; Mai Har Sham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.