Sundeep Khosla1. 1. Endocrine Research Unit, Guggenheim 7, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. khosla.sundeep@mayo.edu
Abstract
CONTEXT: The very clinical trial, the Women's Health Initiative, which definitely established the antifracture efficacy of estrogen therapy, led to the demise of estrogen treatment as a viable, long-term option for prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women due to the well-publicized adverse effects of estrogen plus progestin therapy on a number of nonskeletal endpoints. Given the diminishing clinical use of estrogen, it is logical to question whether estrogen regulation of bone remains a relevant issue at a clinical or basic research level. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Findings of this update are based on a PubMed search and the author's knowledge of the field. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Basic and clinical studies on the mechanisms of estrogen effects on bone will continue to provide potential novel drug targets for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. At a clinical level, it is clear that even the low levels of estrogen present in postmenopausal women have a significant impact on bone turnover, leading to a more aggressive approach to prevent bone loss in patients with breast cancer on aromatase inhibitors. Conversely, increasing these low estrogen levels with small doses of estrogen may have beneficial skeletal effects in postmenopausal women without adverse effects on reproductive tissues. Finally, the search continues for new selective estrogen receptor modulators with beneficial effects on bone and other tissues. CONCLUSIONS: Even in the post-WHI era, basic and clinical investigation on estrogen and bone will continue to yield important insights that not only expand our knowledge at a basic level but also impact the health of our aging population.
CONTEXT: The very clinical trial, the Women's Health Initiative, which definitely established the antifracture efficacy of estrogen therapy, led to the demise of estrogen treatment as a viable, long-term option for prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women due to the well-publicized adverse effects of estrogen plus progestin therapy on a number of nonskeletal endpoints. Given the diminishing clinical use of estrogen, it is logical to question whether estrogen regulation of bone remains a relevant issue at a clinical or basic research level. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Findings of this update are based on a PubMed search and the author's knowledge of the field. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Basic and clinical studies on the mechanisms of estrogen effects on bone will continue to provide potential novel drug targets for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. At a clinical level, it is clear that even the low levels of estrogen present in postmenopausal women have a significant impact on bone turnover, leading to a more aggressive approach to prevent bone loss in patients with breast cancer on aromatase inhibitors. Conversely, increasing these low estrogen levels with small doses of estrogen may have beneficial skeletal effects in postmenopausal women without adverse effects on reproductive tissues. Finally, the search continues for new selective estrogen receptor modulators with beneficial effects on bone and other tissues. CONCLUSIONS: Even in the post-WHI era, basic and clinical investigation on estrogen and bone will continue to yield important insights that not only expand our knowledge at a basic level but also impact the health of our aging population.
Authors: Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Walter M Cronin; Reena S Cecchini; James N Atkins; Therese B Bevers; Louis Fehrenbacher; Eduardo R Pajon; James L Wade; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; Joan James; Scott M Lippman; Carolyn D Runowicz; Patricia A Ganz; Steven E Reis; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; V Craig Jordan; Norman Wolmark Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Steven R Cummings; Kristine Ensrud; Pierre D Delmas; Andrea Z LaCroix; Slobodan Vukicevic; David M Reid; Steven Goldstein; Usha Sriram; Andy Lee; John Thompson; Roisin A Armstrong; David D Thompson; Trevor Powles; Jose Zanchetta; David Kendler; Patrick Neven; Richard Eastell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-02-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: E G Lufkin; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; S F Hodgson; M A Kotowicz; A W Lane; H L Judd; R H Caplan; B L Riggs Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1992-07-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Richard Eastell; Judith E Adams; Robert E Coleman; Anthony Howell; Rosemary A Hannon; Jack Cuzick; John R Mackey; Matthias W Beckmann; Glen Clack Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joshua N Farr; Sundeep Khosla; Yuko Miyabara; Virginia M Miller; Ann E Kearns Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Ulrike I Mödder; Matthew M Roforth; Kelley Hoey; Louise K McCready; James M Peterson; David G Monroe; Merry Jo Oursler; Sundeep Khosla Journal: Bone Date: 2011-04-29 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Jessica E Pritchard; Patrick M Dillon; Mark R Conaway; Corinne M Silva; Sarah J Parsons Journal: Oncology Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 2.935