Literature DB >> 20685842

Barriers to cardiovascular disease risk scoring and primary prevention in Europe.

F D R Hobbs1, J W Jukema, P M Da Silva, T McCormack, A L Catapano.   

Abstract

The prevalence and burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is high, and it remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Unfortunately, many individuals who are at high risk for CVD are not recognized and/or treated. Therefore, programs are available to ensure individuals at risk for CVD are identified through appropriate risk classification and offered optimal preventative interventions. The use of algorithms to determine a global risk score may help to achieve these goals. Such global risk-scoring algorithms takes into account the synergistic effects between individual risk factors, placing increases in individual risk factors into context relative to the overall disease, allowing for a continuum of disease risk to be expressed, and identifying patients most likely to derive benefit from an intervention. The predictive value of risk scoring such as using the Framingham equation is reasonable, analogous to cervical screening, with area under the receiver operated characteristic curve a little over 70%. However, limitations do exist, and as they are identified adjustments can be made to the global risk-scoring algorithms. Limitations include patient-specific issues, such as variations in lifetime risk level, ethnicity or socio-economic strata, and algorithm-specific issues, such as discrepancies between different algorithms arising from varying risk factors evaluated. The use of currently developed algorithms is low in general practice, in part, because of the belief that the assessment may oversimplify the risk and/or lead to medication overuse. Additional hindrances to the use of risk scoring include government or local health policy, patient compliance issues and lack of time. A thorough, easy-to-use, and standardized tool for risk estimation would allow for improvements in the primary prevention of CVD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20685842     DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  QJM        ISSN: 1460-2393


  26 in total

1.  Cardiovascular risk assessment models: Have we found the perfect solution yet?

Authors:  Aiden Abidov; Omar Chehab
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Association Between Primary Care Practitioner Empathy and Risk of Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hajira Dambha-Miller; Adina L Feldman; Ann Louise Kinmonth; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control and Lifestyle Factors in Young to Middle-Aged Adults with Newly Diagnosed Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Michael S Garshick; Georgeta D Vaidean; Anish Vani; James A Underberg; Jonathan D Newman; Jeffrey S Berger; Edward A Fisher; Eugenia Gianos
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 1.869

4.  The burden of behavioral risk factors for cardiovascular disease in Europe. A significant prevention deficit.

Authors:  Maria Vassilaki; Manolis Linardakis; Donna M Polk; Αnastas Philalithis
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  The Impact of Health Literacy-Sensitive Design and Heart Age in a Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Decision Aid: Randomized Controlled Trial and End-User Testing.

Authors:  Carissa Bonner; Carys Batcup; Julie Ayre; Erin Cvejic; Lyndal Trevena; Kirsten McCaffery; Jenny Doust
Journal:  JMIR Cardio       Date:  2022-04-15

6.  Statin use in adults at high risk of cardiovascular disease mortality: cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA).

Authors:  Catriona Murphy; Kathleen Bennett; Tom Fahey; Emer Shelley; Ian Graham; Rose Anne Kenny
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Relationship between cardiovascular risk and lipid testing in one health care system: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Robert J Reid; Melissa L Anderson; Paul A Fishman; Jennifer B McClure; Ron L Johnson; Sheryl L Catz; Beverly B Green
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Metabolic syndrome does not improve the prediction of 5-year cardiovascular disease and total mortality over standard risk markers. Prospective population based study.

Authors:  Alejandro López-Suárez; Antonio Bascuñana-Quirell; Manuel Beltrán-Robles; Javier Elvira-González; Fernando Fernández-Palacín; Elisa Barroso-Casamitjana; Isabel Solino-Ocaña
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  The 30-year cardiovascular risk profile of South Africans with diagnosed diabetes, undiagnosed diabetes, pre-diabetes or normoglycaemia: the Bellville, South Africa pilot study.

Authors:  T E Matsha; M S Hassan; M Kidd; R T Erasmus
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.167

10.  Stroke and coronary heart disease: predictive power of standard risk factors into old age--long-term cumulative risk study among men in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Authors:  Kok Wai Giang; Lena Björck; Masuma Novak; Georgios Lappas; Lars Wilhelmsen; Kjell Torén; Annika Rosengren
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.