Literature DB >> 20685708

Limits to the evolution of assortative mating by female choice under restricted gene flow.

Maria R Servedio1.   

Abstract

The evolution of assortative mating is a key component of the process of speciation with gene flow. Several recent theoretical studies have pointed out, however, that sexual selection which can result from assortative mating may cause it to plateau at an intermediate level; this is primarily owing to search costs of individuals with extreme phenotypes and to assortative preferences developed by individuals with intermediate phenotypes. I explore the limitations of assortative mating further by analysing a simple model in which these factors have been removed. Specifically, I use a haploid two-population model to ask whether the existence of assortative mating is sufficient to drive the further evolution of assortative mating. I find that a weakening in the effective strength of sexual selection with strong assortment leads to the existence of both a peak level of trait differentiation and the evolution of an intermediate level of assortative mating that will cause that peak. This result is robust to the inclusion of local adaptation and different genetic architecture of the trait. The results imply the existence of fundamental limits to the evolution of assortment via sexual selection in this situation, with which other factors, such as search costs, may interact.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20685708      PMCID: PMC3013393          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  22 in total

1.  Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating.

Authors:  M R Servedio
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.

Authors:  M E Hauber; P W Sherman
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Theory and speciation.

Authors:  M Turelli; N H. Barton; J A. Coyne
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Scott L Nuismer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Natural and sexual selection on many loci.

Authors:  N H Barton; M Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Competitive divergence in non-random mating populations.

Authors:  Kristan A Schneider
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Female mate-choice behavior and sympatric speciation.

Authors:  Machteld N Verzijden; Robert F Lachlan; Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Multi-species outcomes in a common model of sympatric speciation.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  An analytically tractable model for competitive speciation.

Authors:  Pleuni S Pennings; Michael Kopp; Géza Meszéna; Ulf Dieckmann; Joachim Hermisson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Frequency-dependent selection and the evolution of assortative mating.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto; Maria R Servedio; Scott L Nuismer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  8 in total

1.  Pairing dynamics and the origin of species.

Authors:  Oscar Puebla; Eldredge Bermingham; Frédéric Guichard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The counterintuitive role of sexual selection in species maintenance and speciation.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A stochastic model for speciation by mating preferences.

Authors:  Camille Coron; Manon Costa; Hélène Leman; Charline Smadi
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Comparative studies on speciation: 30 years since Coyne and Orr.

Authors:  Daniel R Matute; Brandon S Cooper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Geography, assortative mating, and the effects of sexual selection on speciation with gene flow.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Polygamy slows down population divergence in shorebirds.

Authors:  Josephine D'Urban Jackson; Natalie Dos Remedios; Kathryn H Maher; Sama Zefania; Susan Haig; Sara Oyler-McCance; Donald Blomqvist; Terry Burke; Michael W Bruford; Tamás Székely; Clemens Küpper
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  The Effects on Parapatric Divergence of Linkage between Preference and Trait Loci versus Pleiotropy.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Coevolution of male and female mate choice can destabilize reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Thomas G Aubier; Hanna Kokko; Mathieu Joron
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.