Literature DB >> 20684999

A comparison of ST elevation versus non-ST elevation myocardial infarction outcomes in a large registry database: are non-ST myocardial infarctions associated with worse long-term prognoses?

Lech Polonski1, Mariusz Gasior, Marek Gierlotka, Tadeusz Osadnik, Zbigniew Kalarus, Maria Trusz-Gluza, Marian Zembala, Krzysztof Wilczek, Andrzej Lekston, Tomasz Zdrojewski, Michal Tendera.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prognoses in STEMI and NSTEMI beyond one year from onset remain unclear. We aimed to compare the treatments and the two-year outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) enrolled at the Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (PL-ACS).
METHODS: A total of 13,441 patients with MI (8250 with STEMI, and 5191 with NSTEMI) underwent medical care between October 2003 and June 2005 in the Silesia region (4.8 million inhabitants). The events analyzed were death, MI, stroke and percutaneous (PCI) or surgical (CABG) revascularization.
RESULTS: After two years, NSTEMI was associated with a higher incidence of death (hazard ratio (HR) of 1.09 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.17, p<0.0001)); a higher incidence of reinfarction, stroke, CABG and a lower rate of PCI. Adjustments for baseline characteristics and treatment strategy (invasive vs. non-invasive) reversed the HR for mortality and eliminated the difference in MI and stroke. The adjusted HR for mortality was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.71-0.83, p<0.0001). STEMI and NSTEMI patients treated non-invasively were older and showed higher incidences of diabetes, obesity, pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock than their invasively treated counterparts. Invasively treated patients received aspirin, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors and statins more often during hospitalization and at discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The unadjusted long-term prognosis was worse in NSTEMI. After adjustment for the baseline characteristics and treatment strategy, the long-term prognosis was worse in STEMI. Patients with MI treated invasively showed more favorable clinical characteristics and received guideline-recommended therapy more often than patients who did not undergo invasive treatment.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20684999     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings in non-ST-segment elevation versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing early invasive intervention.

Authors:  Jianqiang Xu; Young Bin Song; Joo-Yong Hahn; Sung-A Chang; Sang-Chol Lee; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Jin-Ho Choi; Sang Hoon Lee; Jae K Oh; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Modes and timing of death in 66 252 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes enrolled in 14 TIMI trials.

Authors:  David D Berg; Stephen D Wiviott; Eugene Braunwald; Jianping Guo; KyungAh Im; Amir Kashani; C Michael Gibson; Christopher P Cannon; David A Morrow; Deepak L Bhatt; Jessica L Mega; Michelle L O'Donoghue; Elliott M Antman; L Kristin Newby; Marc S Sabatine; Robert P Giugliano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Predictive models for short- and long-term adverse outcomes following discharge in a contemporary population with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Dharam J Kumbhani; Brian J Wells; A Michael Lincoff; Anil Jain; Susana Arrigain; Changhong Yu; Marlene Goormastic; Stephen G Ellis; Eugene Blackstone; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2013-02-17

4.  Confocal microscopy and biochemical analysis reveal spatial and functional separation between anandamide uptake and hydrolysis in human keratinocytes.

Authors:  S Oddi; M Bari; N Battista; D Barsacchi; I Cozzani; M Maccarrone
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Optimal coronary artery bypass grafting strategy for acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nishi; Taichi Sakaguchi; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Satsuki Fukushima; Daisuke Yoshioka; Tetsuya Saito; Koichi Toda; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-12-20

Review 6.  Assessing Prognosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Recent Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fan Ye; David Winchester; Michael Jansen; Arthur Lee; Burton Silverstein; Carolyn Stalvey; Matheen Khuddus; Joseph Mazza; Steven Yale
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2019-06

7.  Non-STEMI vs. STEMI Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Profile and Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  María José Martínez; Ferran Rueda; Carlos Labata; Teresa Oliveras; Santiago Montero; Marc Ferrer; Nabil El Ouaddi; Jordi Serra; Josep Lupón; Antoni Bayés-Genís; Cosme García-García
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Timing and long-term prognosis of recurrent MI after primary angioplasty : Stent thrombosis vs. non-stent-related reinfarction.

Authors:  A Viveiros Monteiro; R Ramos; A Fiarresga; L de Sousa; D Cacela; L Patrício; L Bernardes; C Soares; R Cruz Ferreira
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  ST-elevation versus non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction after combined use of statin with renin-angiotensin system inhibitor: Data from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.

Authors:  Yong Hoon Kim; Ae-Young Her; Myung Ho Jeong; Byeong-Keuk Kim; Sung-Jin Hong; Seunghwan Kim; Chul-Min Ahn; Jung-Sun Kim; Young-Guk Ko; Donghoon Choi; Myeong-Ki Hong; Yangsoo Jang
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.487

10.  Correlation between the serum procalcitonin level and the extension and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Seyed-Vahid Hashemipour; Hamidreza Pourhosseini; Ali Hosseinsabet
Journal:  Cardiovasc Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.