| Literature DB >> 20682885 |
Epco Hasker1, Pascal Lutumba, Dieudonné Mumba, Veerle Lejon, Phillipe Büscher, Victor Kande, Jean Jacques Muyembe, Joris Menten, Jo Robays, Marleen Boelaert.
Abstract
Control of human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) in the Democratic Republic of Congo is based on mass population screening by mobile teams; a costly and labor-intensive approach. We hypothesized that blood samples collected on filter paper by village health workers and processed in a central laboratory might be a cost-effective alternative. We estimated sensitivity and specificity of micro-card agglutination test for trypanosomiasis (micro-CATT) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)/T.b. gambiense on filter paper samples compared with parasitology-based case classification and used the results in a Monte Carlo simulation of a lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) approach. Micro-CATT and ELISA/T.b. gambiense showed acceptable sensitivity (92.7% [95% CI 87.4-98.0%] and 82.2% [95% CI 75.3-90.4%]) and very high specificity (99.4% [95% CI 99.0-99.9%] and 99.8% [95% CI 99.5-100%]), respectively. Conditional on high sample size per lot (> or = 60%), both tests could reliably distinguish a 2% from a zero prevalence at village level. Alternatively, these tests could be used to identify individual HAT suspects for subsequent confirmation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20682885 PMCID: PMC2911188 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0735
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg ISSN: 0002-9637 Impact factor: 2.345