Literature DB >> 20682702

Reproducibility of [11C]choline-positron emission tomography and effect of trastuzumab.

Laura M Kenny1, Kaiyumars B Contractor, Rainer Hinz, Justin Stebbing, Carlo Palmieri, Jie Jiang, Sami Shousha, Adil Al-Nahhas, R Charles Coombes, Eric O Aboagye.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study sought to evaluate the reproducibility of [(11)C]choline-positron emission tomography and the effect of trastuzumab in breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Twenty-one patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent breast cancer stage II-IV had a baseline dynamic [(11)C]choline-PET scan, 10 patients had a second [(11)C]choline-PET scan to examine reproducibility, and 6 patients had a second scan within a month after trastuzumab. Analysis of [(11)C]choline uptake was measured as the semiquantitative standardized uptake value at 30 and 60 minutes (SUV(30) and SUV(60)), and quantitatively as the net irreversible retention of the radiotracer at steady-state (Ki) and plasma to tissue exchange at 60 minutes (IRF60min).
RESULTS: Breast tumor lesions in all patients were visualized by [(11)C]choline PET. The difference in tumor versus normal tissue uptake was significant for SUV(30), SUV(60), Ki, and IRF60 minutes (Wilcoxon P < 0.0001). At 60 minutes postinjection, 15.1 +/- 2.16% of plasma radioactivity was due to unmetabolized [(11)C]choline radioactivity. [(11)C]Choline uptake was reproducible in breast tumor lesions (r(2) = 0.9 for SUV, 0.9 for Ki, and 0.8 for IRF60). Early responses to trastuzumab measured by [(11)C]choline-PET were significant in three lesions occurring in two patients who responded clinically.
CONCLUSIONS: [(11)C]Choline-PET uptake variables can be reproducibly assessed. Initial studies show that trastuzumab decreases [(11)C]choline uptake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20682702     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  10 in total

Review 1.  Development of radiotracers for oncology--the interface with pharmacology.

Authors:  Rohini Sharma; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  11C-Choline Pharmacokinetics in Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Milan Grkovski; Karem Gharzeddine; Peter Sawan; Heiko Schöder; Laure Michaud; Wolfgang A Weber; John L Humm
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Metabolic effects of signal transduction inhibition in cancer assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Siver Andreas Moestue; Olav Engebraaten; Ingrid Susann Gribbestad
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Reproducibility and reliability of anti-3-[¹⁸F]FACBC uptake measurements in background structures and malignant lesions on follow-up PET-CT in prostate carcinoma: an exploratory analysis.

Authors:  Oluwaseun A Odewole; Oyeladun A Oyenuga; Funmilayo Tade; Bital Savir-Baruch; Peter T Nieh; Viraj Master; Zhengjia Chen; Xiaojing Wang; Ashesh B Jani; Leah M Bellamy; Raghuveer K Halkar; Mark M Goodman; David M Schuster
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  18F-Fluorocholine PET uptake correlates with pathologic evidence of recurrent tumor after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.

Authors:  Milan Grkovski; Zachary A Kohutek; Heiko Schöder; Cameron W Brennan; Viviane S Tabar; Philip H Gutin; Zhigang Zhang; Robert J Young; Bradley J Beattie; Pat B Zanzonico; Jason T Huse; Marc K Rosenblum; Ronald G Blasberg; John L Humm; Kathryn Beal
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Introduction to the analysis of PET data in oncology.

Authors:  Giampaolo Tomasi; Eric O Aboagye
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  Non-conventional and Investigational PET Radiotracers for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michele Balma; Virginia Liberini; Manuela Racca; Riccardo Laudicella; Matteo Bauckneht; Ambra Buschiazzo; Daniele Giovanni Nicolotti; Simona Peano; Andrea Bianchi; Giovanni Albano; Natale Quartuccio; Ronan Abgral; Silvia Daniela Morbelli; Calogero D'Alessandria; Enzo Terreno; Martin William Huellner; Alberto Papaleo; Désirée Deandreis
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 8.  Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Tumor Cell Metabolism and Application to Therapy Response Monitoring.

Authors:  Amarnath Challapalli; Eric O Aboagye
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Current Landscape of Breast Cancer Imaging and Potential Quantitative Imaging Markers of Response in ER-Positive Breast Cancers Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Ella F Jones; Deep K Hathi; Rita Freimanis; Rita A Mukhtar; A Jo Chien; Laura J Esserman; Laura J Van't Veer; Bonnie N Joe; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 10.  Predicting the response to neoadjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer: tumor-, blood-, and imaging-related biomarkers.

Authors:  Wenyong Tan; Ming Yang; Hongli Yang; Fangbin Zhou; Weixi Shen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.989

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.