OBJECTIVE: To examine whether specific pregnancy and delivery complications are risk factors for postpartum depression. DESIGN: A prospective longitudinal study. SETTING: Rotterdam, the Netherlands. POPULATION: A cohort of 4941 pregnant women who enrolled in the Generation R Study. METHODS: Information on perinatal complications was obtained from the midwife and hospital registries or by questionnaire. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the risk of postpartum depression for the separate perinatal complications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postpartum psychiatric symptoms were assessed 2 months after delivery using the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. RESULTS: Several perinatal complications were significantly associated with postpartum depression, namely: pre-eclampsia (adjusted OR, aOR 2.58, 95% CI 1.30-5.14), hospitalization during pregnancy (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.19-4.26), emergency caesarean section (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.02-2.31), suspicion of fetal distress (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.08-2.27), a medically indicated delivery provided by an obstetrician (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 1.56-3.78), and hospital admission of the baby (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10-1.92). Unplanned pregnancy, thrombosis, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and Apgar score were not associated with postpartum depression after adjustment for confounding factors, such as pre-existing psychopathological symptoms and sociodemographic characteristics. The risk of postpartum depression increased with the number of perinatal complications women experienced (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We showed that several pregnancy and delivery complications present a risk for women's mental health in the postpartum period. Obstetricians, midwives, general practitioners, and staff at baby well clinics should be aware that women who experienced perinatal complications-especially those with a number of perinatal complications-are at risk for developing postpartum depression.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether specific pregnancy and delivery complications are risk factors for postpartum depression. DESIGN: A prospective longitudinal study. SETTING: Rotterdam, the Netherlands. POPULATION: A cohort of 4941 pregnant women who enrolled in the Generation R Study. METHODS: Information on perinatal complications was obtained from the midwife and hospital registries or by questionnaire. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the risk of postpartum depression for the separate perinatal complications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postpartum psychiatric symptoms were assessed 2 months after delivery using the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. RESULTS: Several perinatal complications were significantly associated with postpartum depression, namely: pre-eclampsia (adjusted OR, aOR 2.58, 95% CI 1.30-5.14), hospitalization during pregnancy (aOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.19-4.26), emergency caesarean section (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.02-2.31), suspicion of fetal distress (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.08-2.27), a medically indicated delivery provided by an obstetrician (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 1.56-3.78), and hospital admission of the baby (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10-1.92). Unplanned pregnancy, thrombosis, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and Apgar score were not associated with postpartum depression after adjustment for confounding factors, such as pre-existing psychopathological symptoms and sociodemographic characteristics. The risk of postpartum depression increased with the number of perinatal complications women experienced (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We showed that several pregnancy and delivery complications present a risk for women's mental health in the postpartum period. Obstetricians, midwives, general practitioners, and staff at baby well clinics should be aware that women who experienced perinatal complications-especially those with a number of perinatal complications-are at risk for developing postpartum depression.
Authors: Whitney P Witt; Lauren E Wisk; Erika R Cheng; John M Hampton; Paul D Creswell; Erika W Hagen; Hilary A Spear; Torsheika Maddox; Thomas Deleire Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2011-02-24
Authors: K Koutra; M Vassilaki; V Georgiou; A Koutis; P Bitsios; M Kogevinas; L Chatzi Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 6.892
Authors: H G Dahlen; H P Kennedy; C M Anderson; A F Bell; A Clark; M Foureur; J E Ohm; A M Shearman; J Y Taylor; M L Wright; S Downe Journal: Med Hypotheses Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 1.538
Authors: Sohye Kim; Timothy A Soeken; Sara J Cromer; Sheila R Martinez; Leah R Hardy; Lane Strathearn Journal: Brain Res Date: 2013-11-14 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Sarah Lederberg Stone; Hafsatou Diop; Eugene Declercq; Howard J Cabral; Matthew P Fox; Lauren A Wise Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Ann M Kingsbury; Reza Hayatbakhsh; Abdullah M Mamun; Alexandra M Clavarino; Gail Williams; Jake M Najman Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2015-04
Authors: Elizabeth Wall-Wieler; Suzan L Carmichael; Marcelo L Urquia; Can Liu; Anders Hjern Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 3.633