Literature DB >> 20681818

Randomized, controlled, single-masked, clinical study to compare and evaluate the efficacy of microspheres and gel in periodontal pocket therapy.

S Srirangarajan1, Raghavendra C Mundargi, S Ravindra, Swati B Setty, T M Aminabhavi, Srinath Thakur.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this randomized, split-mouth, single-masked study is to compare the efficacy of a gel and microspheres as drug-delivery systems in the treatment of periodontal disease.
METHODS: Microspheres were prepared, the release patterns of the microspheres and gel formulations were analyzed using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer, and particle shapes were studied under a scanning electron microscope. A split-mouth design was followed in which 30 potential sites were identified and divided into three groups: one control group and two groups in which microspheres or a gel was placed. Patients were recalled at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months. Clinical recordings included plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), and relative attachment level (RAL) measurements; subgingival plaque was also obtained for microbiologic examination prior to and after therapy.
RESULTS: Microspheres had a more sustained release and a high initial drug concentration. There was a significant improvement in the PI and GI in the initial 3 months. The results were statistically significant at P = 0.01. The mean PD scores among scores for the three groups at baseline and follow-up visits showed a reduction of 0.4 to 1 mm. The microbiologic parameters were also statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the type of delivery system could significantly influence the outcome of therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20681818     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.100324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  4 in total

1.  Locally delivered minocycline microspheres do not impair osseointegration of titanium implants in a rat femur model.

Authors:  Joshua A Shapiro; Samuel AbuMoussa; Christopher P Lindsay; Gabriel B Mason; Laurence E Dahners; Paul S Weinhold
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-12-12

Review 2.  Biomaterials Used for Periodontal Disease Treatment: Focusing on Immunomodulatory Properties.

Authors:  H Garzón; L J Suárez; S Muñoz; J Cardona; M Fontalvo; C A Alfonso-Rodríguez
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2022-04-26

3.  The Application of Microencapsulation Techniques in the Treatment of Endodontic and Periodontal Diseases.

Authors:  Asteria Luzardo Alvarez; Francisco Otero Espinar; José Blanco Méndez
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 4.  Professionally Delivered Local Antimicrobials in the Treatment of Patients with Periodontitis-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Amar Sholapurkar; Dileep Sharma; Beverley Glass; Catherine Miller; Alan Nimmo; Ernest Jennings
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.