Literature DB >> 2068106

Bacterial chemotaxis signaling complexes: formation of a CheA/CheW complex enhances autophosphorylation and affinity for CheY.

D F McNally1, P Matsumura.   

Abstract

We have demonstrated that a complex of the proteins CheA (CheAL and CheAS) and CheW can be isolated and constitutes a functional unit that responds to the signaling state of the chemoreceptors. The autophosphorylation rate of CheAL is much greater when CheAL and CheAS are complexed with CheW. Moreover, the presence of mutant chemoreceptors that cause cells to tumble increases this rate. At wild-type levels of expression, the isolated CheAL/CheAS/CheW complex accounts for about 10% of the total number of CheAL, CheAS, and CheW molecules and exists in a 1:1:1 stoichiometry. This complex is also required for CheAL/CheAS and CheW binding to the phosphorylation substrate, CheY. A separate interaction between CheY and another chemotaxis component, CheZ, was also detected. The CheY-CheZ interaction does not require participation of the CheAL/CheAS/CheW complex.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2068106      PMCID: PMC52064          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.14.6269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  20 in total

1.  The dynamics of protein phosphorylation in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  K A Borkovich; M I Simon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-12-21       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Role of CheW protein in coupling membrane receptors to the intracellular signaling system of bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  J D Liu; J S Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Transmembrane signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis involves ligand-dependent activation of phosphate group transfer.

Authors:  K A Borkovich; N Kaplan; J F Hess; M I Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  N-terminal half of CheB is involved in methylesterase response to negative chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R C Stewart; F W Dahlquist
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Both CheA and CheW are required for reconstitution of chemotactic signaling in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M P Conley; A J Wolfe; D F Blair; H C Berg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Phosphorylation of an N-terminal regulatory domain activates the CheB methylesterase in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  A Lupas; J Stock
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-10-15       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Histidine phosphorylation and phosphoryl group transfer in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  J F Hess; R B Bourret; M I Simon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-11-10       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Sensory transduction in bacterial chemotaxis involves phosphotransfer between Che proteins.

Authors:  D Wylie; A Stock; C Y Wong; J Stock
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1988-03-15       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Protein phosphorylation is involved in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  J F Hess; K Oosawa; P Matsumura; M I Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Mutants defective in bacterial chemotaxis show modified protein phosphorylation.

Authors:  K Oosawa; J F Hess; M I Simon
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-04-08       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  29 in total

1.  Polar clustering of the chemoreceptor complex in Escherichia coli occurs in the absence of complete CheA function.

Authors:  J M Skidmore; D D Ellefson; B P McNamara; M M Couto; A J Wolfe; J R Maddock
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Binding and diffusion of CheR molecules within a cluster of membrane receptors.

Authors:  Matthew D Levin; Thomas S Shimizu; Dennis Bray
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  A chemotactic signaling surface on CheY defined by suppressors of flagellar switch mutations.

Authors:  S J Roman; M Meyers; K Volz; P Matsumura
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Mutational analysis of the chemoreceptor-coupling domain of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis signaling kinase CheA.

Authors:  Jinshi Zhao; John S Parkinson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Minimal requirements for oxygen sensing by the aerotaxis receptor Aer.

Authors:  Kylie J Watts; Mark S Johnson; Barry L Taylor
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  Coexpression of the long and short forms of CheA, the chemotaxis histidine kinase, by members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  B P McNamara; A J Wolfe
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  A model of excitation and adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  D C Hauri; J Ross
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Computer-aided resolution of an experimental paradox in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  W N Abouhamad; D Bray; M Schuster; K C Boesch; R E Silversmith; R B Bourret
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Phosphorylating and dephosphorylating protein complexes in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  H Wang; P Matsumura
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Structure-function relationships in the HAMP and proximal signaling domains of the aerotaxis receptor Aer.

Authors:  Kylie J Watts; Mark S Johnson; Barry L Taylor
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.