Ming Gang Su1, Rong Tian, Qiu Ping Fan, Ye Tian, Fang Lan Li, Lin Li, An Ren Kuang, John Howard Miller. 1. National Key Discipline of Medical Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University School of Medicine, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. suminggang@sina.com
Abstract
PURPOSE: Fibrous dysplasia of bone (FDB) reveals intense 18F-FDG uptake mimicking metastases on 18F-FDG PET/CT. We reviewed sites of FDB revealed by 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging to allow identification of this abnormality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients (7 male, 4 female, aged 16-78 years) were evaluated after 55 MBq (0.15 mCi)/kg 18F-FDG utilizing a 16-slice multiple detector CT (MDCT) whole-body PET scanner, with LOR algorithm 3D reconstruction. One- and 2-h imaging was performed in 9 patients. Standard uptake value (SUV) for each lesion, on early and delayed imaging, was calculated. Lesions were confirmed in 6 patients by biopsy. The PET images correlated with MDCT to establish the imaging characteristics. RESULTS: Solitary lesions were found in 4 patients, two lesions in 1 patient, and in 6 patients there were multiple bone lesions. The SUV(early) ranged from 1.23 to 9.64 with an average of 3.76 ± 2.40. The SUV(delayed) ranged from 1.76 to 11.42 with an average of 4.51 ± 3.07. The SUV(delayed) decreased or increased slightly (-31% to 5%) in 6 of our patients, and increased significantly (11% to 39%) in 3. There was a negative correlation between SUVs and age, as well as the number of affected bones. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, FDB had wide skeletal distribution with variability of 18F-FDG uptake and CT appearance. SUV in the delayed stage was seen to either decrease or increase on dual-time 18F-FDG PET scanning. It is very important to recognize the characteristics of this skeletal dysplasia to allow differentiation from skeletal metastasis.
PURPOSE:Fibrous dysplasia of bone (FDB) reveals intense 18F-FDG uptake mimicking metastases on 18F-FDG PET/CT. We reviewed sites of FDB revealed by 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging to allow identification of this abnormality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven patients (7 male, 4 female, aged 16-78 years) were evaluated after 55 MBq (0.15 mCi)/kg 18F-FDG utilizing a 16-slice multiple detector CT (MDCT) whole-body PET scanner, with LOR algorithm 3D reconstruction. One- and 2-h imaging was performed in 9 patients. Standard uptake value (SUV) for each lesion, on early and delayed imaging, was calculated. Lesions were confirmed in 6 patients by biopsy. The PET images correlated with MDCT to establish the imaging characteristics. RESULTS: Solitary lesions were found in 4 patients, two lesions in 1 patient, and in 6 patients there were multiple bone lesions. The SUV(early) ranged from 1.23 to 9.64 with an average of 3.76 ± 2.40. The SUV(delayed) ranged from 1.76 to 11.42 with an average of 4.51 ± 3.07. The SUV(delayed) decreased or increased slightly (-31% to 5%) in 6 of our patients, and increased significantly (11% to 39%) in 3. There was a negative correlation between SUVs and age, as well as the number of affected bones. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, FDB had wide skeletal distribution with variability of 18F-FDG uptake and CT appearance. SUV in the delayed stage was seen to either decrease or increase on dual-time 18F-FDG PET scanning. It is very important to recognize the characteristics of this skeletal dysplasia to allow differentiation from skeletal metastasis.
Authors: Kimberly A Fitzpatrick; Mihra S Taljanovic; Donald P Speer; Anna R Graham; Jon A Jacobson; George R Barnes; Tim B Hunter Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Selene G Parekh; Rakesh Donthineni-Rao; Eric Ricchetti; Richard D Lackman Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Leonieke Terpstra; Frank Rauch; Horacio Plotkin; Rose Travers; Francis H Glorieux Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: J Aoki; H Watanabe; T Shinozaki; K Takagishi; H Ishijima; N Oya; N Sato; T Inoue; K Endo Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M Schulte; D Brecht-Krauss; B Heymer; A Guhlmann; E Hartwig; M R Sarkar; C G Diederichs; A Von Baer; J Kotzerke; S N Reske Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Abhay Gundgurthi; M K Garg; Reena Bhardwaj; Sandeep Kharb; Aditi Pandit; Karninder S Brar; Ravi Kumar; A G Pandit Journal: Indian J Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-11
Authors: Bela S Purohit; Maria Isabel Vargas; Angeliki Ailianou; Laura Merlini; Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Alexandra Platon; Bénédicte M Delattre; Olivier Rager; Karim Burkhardt; Minerva Becker Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2015-10-31