Literature DB >> 20680449

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumours >4 cm compared with smaller tumours: perioperative results.

A Nouralizadeh1, N Simforoosh, A Tabibi, A Basiri, S A M Ziaee, M Soleimani, M H Radfar, M Abedinzadeh, A H Kashi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The use of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) in patients with tumours >4 cm remains to be further evaluated. We report our experience with LPN in tumours >4 cm compared with tumours ≤4 cm.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of data from all LPN patients operated from 2003 to 2008. Inclusion criteria were a single organ confined contrast enhancing mass/Bosniac III-IV cyst. Hospital admission records were used to extract operative and follow-up data. Patients were grouped into group A: ≤4 cm (32 patients, 53% of total), and group B: >4 cm (28 patients, 47% of total).
RESULTS: A total of 60 patients (mean ± SD age, 47.4 ± 13.4 years; M/F, 36/24) were included. Mean ± SD tumour size was 31.5 ± 7.3 mm and 51.6 ± 10.9 mm in groups A and B, respectively. (P < 0.001) Malignant pathology was present in 22 (69%) and 16 patients (57%) in groups A and B, respectively. (P > 0.05) There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender, pre-operative creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and other investigated pre-operative characteristics between study groups. (all P > 0.05) Nor any difference was observed regarding operative and pathologic (warm ischaemia time, operation duration, transfusion, positive margins, and malignant histology) as well as post-operative variables (re-hospitalization, post-operative complications, hospital stay, or eGFR changes).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study supports the feasibility and comparability of operative and post-operative early complications for LPN when applied to tumours >4 cm in selected patients compared with tumours ≤4 cm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20680449     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-010-9812-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  26 in total

1.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Jose R Colombo; Igor Frank; Alireza Moinzadeh; Jihad Kaouk; Mihir Desai
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: contemporary technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Georges-Pascal Haber; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Quality of life and psychological adaptation after surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of the amount of remaining renal tissue.

Authors:  P E Clark; L R Schover; R G Uzzo; K S Hafez; L A Rybicki; A C Novick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours.

Authors:  G Kovacs; M Akhtar; B J Beckwith; P Bugert; C S Cooper; B Delahunt; J N Eble; S Fleming; B Ljungberg; L J Medeiros; H Moch; V E Reuter; E Ritz; G Roos; D Schmidt; J R Srigley; S Störkel; E van den Berg; B Zbar
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  Elective nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma larger than 4 cm.

Authors:  Sascha Pahernik; Frederik Roos; Bernd Röhrig; Christoph Wiesner; Joachim W Thüroff
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-11-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  A comparison of prediction equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate in adults without kidney disease.

Authors:  Julie Lin; Eric L Knight; Mary Lou Hogan; Ajay K Singh
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Nephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Bradley C Leibovich; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Amy L Weaver; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Surena F Matin; Mihir M Desai; Jihad H Kaouk; Andrew Steinberg; Ed Mascha; Julie Thornton; Mahmoud H Sherief; Brenda Strzempkowski; Andrew C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S A Fuhrman; L C Lasky; C Limas
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery.

Authors:  S E Lerner; C A Hawkins; M L Blute; A Grabner; P C Wollan; J T Eickholt; H Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: current status, techniques, and future directions.

Authors:  Paurush Babbar; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Predictive preoperative factors for renal insufficiency in patients followed for more than 5 years after radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Joong Seo Ahn; Hyung Joon Kim; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi; Seong Soo Jeon
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-05-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.