Literature DB >> 20680312

Continuous versus interrupted episiotomy repair with monofilament or multifilament absorbed suture materials: a randomised controlled trial.

Demet Kokanalı1, Mustafa Ugur, M Kuntay Kokanalı, Rana Karayalcın, Esra Tonguc.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare different repair techniques and different suture materials for episiotomy.
METHODS: 160 women having vertex delivery with right-mediolateral episiotomy were randomly allocated to four groups. In the groups where continuos technique was performed, vaginal mucosa, perineal muscles and the skin were sutured continuously. In the groups of interrupted technique, vaginal mucosa was sutured with continuous sutures, then muscle layers and skin were closed by interrupted sutures. Two different types of synthetic absorbed suture material were used: monofilament type is in form of polyglycolide-co-caprolactone and multifilament one is polyglactin 910-Rapide. Perineal pain during different activities on the first and tenth day postpartum and also during sexual intercourse 6 weeks after the delivery was questioned by visual analogous scale (VAS). Furthermore, repair time, amount of suture and episiotomy complications were investigated in each groups.
RESULTS: On the first day after delivery, the perineal pain scores, the repair time, the amount of suture were statistically less in the continuous technique groups. The differences between the pain at tenth day and during sexual intercourse 6 weeks after the delivery were statistically same.
CONCLUSIONS: The continuous suturing techniques for episiotomy closure, compared to interrupted methods, are associated with less short-term pain, are quicker and also need less suture material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20680312     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1620-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  6 in total

Review 1.  Continuous and interrupted suturing techniques for repair of episiotomy or second-degree tears.

Authors:  Christine Kettle; Therese Dowswell; Khaled Mk Ismail
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

2.  The effects of continuous and interrupted episiotomy repair on pain severity and rate of perineal repair: a controlled randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Shirin Hasanpoor; Soheila Bani; Rudabe Shahgole; Morteza Gojazadeh
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2012-08-25

Review 3.  Techniques for Repair of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries.

Authors:  Melanie R Meister; Joshua I Rosenbloom; Jerry L Lowder; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.347

4.  The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for skin repair in mediolateral episiotomies: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roeland Odijk; Bernadette Hennipman; Melek Rousian; Khadija Madani; Marja Dijksterhuis; Jan Willem de Leeuw; Arjan van Hof
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Continuous versus discontinuous suture in perineal injuries produced during delivery in primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano; Beatriz Arredondo-López; Leticia Molina-Garcia; Ana Maria Cámara-Jurado; Eva Cocera-Ruiz; Miguel Rodríguez-Delgado
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Postpartum Dyspareunia Following Continuous Versus Interrupted Perineal Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Emma M Schnittka; Nick W Lanpher; Praful Patel
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.