Stephanie Katzenmaier1, Christoph Markert, Gerd Mikus. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Midazolam metabolic clearance to 1'-hydroxymidazolam is an accurate measure of CYP3A activity which requires extensive plasma and urine sampling. The objective of this study was to find a new limited sampling strategy (LSS) to predict midazolam metabolic clearance to 1'-hydroxymidazolam and subsequently CYP3A activity in an easy and reliable way, reducing costs and labour. METHODS: The development of this LSS is based on data from an in vivo drug-drug interaction study carried out in our clinical research unit. Various partial AUCs of midazolam were calculated and correlated with metabolic clearance of midazolam to 1'-hydroxymidazolam by non-linear regression. The correlation with highest r (2) values was chosen to predict the midazolam metabolic clearance. Statistical significance of this method was verified by calculating the 95% confidence interval of the differences (%) between predicted and measured metabolic clearance of midazolam to 1'-hydroxymidazolam. RESULTS: The midazolam partial AUC from 2 to 4 h after oral administration correlated best with metabolic clearance of midazolam to 1'-hydroxymidazolam with r (2) = 0.9816. This partial AUC comprised four midazolam concentrations at 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 h after oral administration of a midazolam solution. The 95% confidence interval of the differences between predicted metabolic clearance and measured metabolic clearance of midazolam to 1'-hydroxymidazolam was -0.97 to +13.2. CONCLUSION: The determination of the partial AUC using four plasma samples from 2 to 4 h after oral administration of a midazolam solution is proposed to be an easy and reliable CYP3A phenotyping measure which of course needs to be validated in prospective clinical trials.
PURPOSE:Midazolam metabolic clearance to 1'-hydroxymidazolam is an accurate measure of CYP3A activity which requires extensive plasma and urine sampling. The objective of this study was to find a new limited sampling strategy (LSS) to predict midazolam metabolic clearance to 1'-hydroxymidazolam and subsequently CYP3A activity in an easy and reliable way, reducing costs and labour. METHODS: The development of this LSS is based on data from an in vivo drug-drug interaction study carried out in our clinical research unit. Various partial AUCs of midazolam were calculated and correlated with metabolic clearance of midazolam to 1'-hydroxymidazolam by non-linear regression. The correlation with highest r (2) values was chosen to predict the midazolam metabolic clearance. Statistical significance of this method was verified by calculating the 95% confidence interval of the differences (%) between predicted and measured metabolic clearance of midazolam to 1'-hydroxymidazolam. RESULTS: The midazolam partial AUC from 2 to 4 h after oral administration correlated best with metabolic clearance of midazolam to 1'-hydroxymidazolam with r (2) = 0.9816. This partial AUC comprised four midazolam concentrations at 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 h after oral administration of a midazolam solution. The 95% confidence interval of the differences between predicted metabolic clearance and measured metabolic clearance of midazolam to 1'-hydroxymidazolam was -0.97 to +13.2. CONCLUSION: The determination of the partial AUC using four plasma samples from 2 to 4 h after oral administration of a midazolam solution is proposed to be an easy and reliable CYP3A phenotyping measure which of course needs to be validated in prospective clinical trials.
Authors: Janyce F Rogers; Anne N Nafziger; Angela D M Kashuba; Daniel S Streetman; Mario L Rocci; Edna F Choo; Grant R Wilkinson; Joseph S Bertino Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Oscar Quintela; Angelines Cruz; Marta Concheiro; Ana de Castro; Manuel López-Rivadulla Journal: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom Date: 2004 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: David J Greenblatt; Diane E Peters; Lauren E Oleson; Jerold S Harmatz; Malcolm W MacNab; Noah Berkowitz; Miguel A Zinny; Michael H Court Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: K E Thummel; D O'Shea; M F Paine; D D Shen; K L Kunze; J D Perkins; G R Wilkinson Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 1996-05 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Scott R Penzak; Kristin H Busse; Sarah M Robertson; Elizabeth Formentini; Raul M Alfaro; Richard T Davey Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2008-04-16 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Andrea Huppertz; Lars Werntz; Andreas D Meid; Kathrin I Foerster; Jürgen Burhenne; David Czock; Gerd Mikus; Walter E Haefeli Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Joanna C Masters; Denise M Harano; Howard E Greenberg; Shirley M Tsunoda; In-Jin Jang; Joseph D Ma Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: A Janssen; C P M Verkleij; A van der Vlist; R H J Mathijssen; H J Bloemendal; R Ter Heine Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Madelé van Dyk; Asha J Kapetas; Ashley M Hopkins; A David Rodrigues; Manoli Vourvahis; Michael J Sorich; Andrew Rowland Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 5.810