Lawrence Buchner1, George Vamvakias, Dror Rom. 1. Fairfield and Bridgewater, N.J.; and Wayne, Pa. From Canfield Scientific, Inc.; sanofi-aventis U.S.; and Prosoft Software, Inc.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reliable clinical assessment tools are needed to evaluate the effects of injectable devices and fillers. This study was designed to validate a new photonumeric wrinkle assessment scale using standardized photographic methodology to obtain reference photographs. METHODS: Multiple photographs (test set) from approximately 78 volunteer subjects with varying degrees of severity of the left/right nasolabial fold wrinkles were examined. Photographs of 18 subjects representing the full spectrum of nasolabial fold wrinkle severity were selected from the test set by a study team of three independent physicians and were classified using a six-point scale (0 = no wrinkles; 5 = very deep wrinkle, redundant fold). One representative photograph was identified by study team consensus for each of the six scale points. Photographs were randomly arranged in booklets for a second, independent, group of five physician raters to grade both left/right nasolabial fold wrinkles twice over a 2-week interval. The scale was considered valid if interevaluator reliability, as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient, was greater than or equal to 80 percent. RESULTS: Intrarater reliability was significant (p < 0.001) for all five physicians and overall, with Pearson correlation coefficients greater than 92 percent in all cases. The overall weighted kappa coefficient for intrarater reliability for all five raters was 0.598 (range, 0.433 to 0.684). The overall interrater reliability kappa value was 0.525, and a high degree of interrater reliability was observed at week 1 and week 2 time points (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.890 and 0.880, p < 0.001 for both), validating the new wrinkle assessment scale. CONCLUSION: This study validates the new wrinkle assessment scale, which provides a reliable clinical tool for use in nasolabial fold wrinkle evaluation.
BACKGROUND: Reliable clinical assessment tools are needed to evaluate the effects of injectable devices and fillers. This study was designed to validate a new photonumeric wrinkle assessment scale using standardized photographic methodology to obtain reference photographs. METHODS: Multiple photographs (test set) from approximately 78 volunteer subjects with varying degrees of severity of the left/right nasolabial fold wrinkles were examined. Photographs of 18 subjects representing the full spectrum of nasolabial fold wrinkle severity were selected from the test set by a study team of three independent physicians and were classified using a six-point scale (0 = no wrinkles; 5 = very deep wrinkle, redundant fold). One representative photograph was identified by study team consensus for each of the six scale points. Photographs were randomly arranged in booklets for a second, independent, group of five physician raters to grade both left/right nasolabial fold wrinkles twice over a 2-week interval. The scale was considered valid if interevaluator reliability, as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient, was greater than or equal to 80 percent. RESULTS: Intrarater reliability was significant (p < 0.001) for all five physicians and overall, with Pearson correlation coefficients greater than 92 percent in all cases. The overall weighted kappa coefficient for intrarater reliability for all five raters was 0.598 (range, 0.433 to 0.684). The overall interrater reliability kappa value was 0.525, and a high degree of interrater reliability was observed at week 1 and week 2 time points (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.890 and 0.880, p < 0.001 for both), validating the new wrinkle assessment scale. CONCLUSION: This study validates the new wrinkle assessment scale, which provides a reliable clinical tool for use in nasolabial fold wrinkle evaluation.
Authors: David Hui; Carlos Eduardo Paiva; Egidio G Del Fabbro; Christopher Steer; Jane Naberhuis; Marianne van de Wetering; Paz Fernández-Ortega; Tatsuya Morita; Sang-Yeon Suh; Eduardo Bruera; Masanori Mori Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Greg J Goodman; Michael B Halstead; John D Rogers; Daniela Borzillo; Elizabeth Ryan; Nick Riley; John Wlodarczyk Journal: Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol Date: 2012-01-18
Authors: Shraddha Mehta; Rowena F Bastero-Caballero; Yijun Sun; Ray Zhu; Diane K Murphy; Bhushan Hardas; Gary Koch Journal: Stat Med Date: 2018-04-29 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Jean Carruthers; Lisa Donofrio; Bhushan Hardas; Diane K Murphy; Derek Jones; Alastair Carruthers; Jonathan M Sykes; Lela Creutz; Ann Marx; Sara Dill Journal: Dermatol Surg Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.398