Literature DB >> 20679822

Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.

Derrick C Wan1, Charles Y Tseng, John Anderson-Dam, Andrew L Dalio, Christopher A Crisera, Jaco H Festekjian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pedicled and free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps remain popular for autologous breast reconstruction, but the incidence of abdominal donor-site bulge and hernia is significantly greater when compared with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction. Mesh repair after muscle harvest, however, may reduce the complication rate to that observed with perforator flaps alone.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all free flap breast reconstructions at the University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center from 2002 to 2007 was performed. Abdominal bulge and hernia were noted for patients undergoing free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flap reconstructions and were compared with those observed following DIEP flap reconstructions.
RESULTS: A total of 275 free TRAM plus muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps and 200 DIEP flaps were performed. Among patients with free and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps, 11.3 percent were found to have postoperative abdominal bulge or hernia. Only 3.5 percent of DIEP flap patients had abdominal complications. Incorporating mesh into the rectus fascia repair significantly reduced the abdominal complications reported to 5.1 percent. Of the 86 free and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps that were bilateral, 12.8 percent had hernias/bulges. Use of mesh with bilateral free and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps reduced the complication rate to 3.7 percent.
CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating mesh into rectus fascia repair in free and muscle-sparing free TRAM flap cases significantly reduces the rate of postoperative abdominal complications to levels equivalent to those for DIEP flap reconstructions. The authors advocate deciding intraoperatively between DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flap dissections based on ease of dissection and whichever offers optimal safety and flap perfusion. Routine use of mesh in donor-site repair will decrease postoperative abdominal morbidity in unilateral and bilateral cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20679822     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de1b7e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  12 in total

1.  Flap coverage of anterior abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  Justin M Sacks; Justin M Broyles; Donald P Baumann
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods.

Authors:  Sheina A Macadam; Toni Zhong; Katie Weichman; Michael Papsdorf; Peter A Lennox; Alexes Hazen; Evan Matros; Joseph Disa; Babak Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Paris D Butler; Liza C Wu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

Review 4.  Morbidity of the Donor Site and Complication Rates of Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Abdominal Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hatan Mortada; Taif Fawaz AlNojaidi; Razan AlRabah; Yousif Almohammadi; Raghad AlKhashan; Hattan Aljaaly
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 2.269

5.  Abdominal Flap-based Breast Reconstruction versus Abdominoplasty: The Impact of Surgical Procedure on Scar Location.

Authors:  Alexander Y Li; Arash Momeni
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-09-24

6.  Breast reconstruction with single-pedicle TRAM flap in breast cancer patients with low midline abdominal scar.

Authors:  Jun-Dong Wu; Wen-He Huang; Si-Qi Qiu; Li-Fang He; Cui-Ping Guo; Yong-Qu Zhang; Fan Zhang; Guo-Jun Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Analysis of 461 Consecutive Patients' Donor Site Morbidity following Abdominal Tissue-Based Breast Reconstruction without Fascia Reinforcement Graft.

Authors:  Seong Ae Kim; Daheui Kim; Deuk Young Oh; Jung Ho Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Polypropylene Mesh Complications in the Sublay Position After Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Les complications des treillis de polypropylène en sous-couche après une reconstruction mammaire par voie abdominale.

Authors:  Casey T Kraft; Bianca J Molina; Roman J Skoracki
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 0.947

9.  Total posterior leg open wound management with free anterolateral thigh flap: case and literature review.

Authors:  Soleiman Osman; Stephanie Chou; James Rosing; David E Sahar
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-09-27

10.  Interdisciplinary Treatment of Breast Cancer After Mastectomy With Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Abdominal Free Flaps in a University Teaching Hospital-A Standardized and Safe Procedure.

Authors:  Dominik Steiner; Raymund E Horch; Ingo Ludolph; Marweh Schmitz; Justus P Beier; Andreas Arkudas
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.