J S Roberts1, J H Karlawish, W R Uhlmann, R C Petersen, R C Green. 1. Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. jscottr@umich.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess how neurologists view mild cognitive impairment (MCI) as a clinical diagnosis and how they treat patients with mild cognitive symptoms. METHODS: Members of the American Academy of Neurology with an aging, dementia, or behavioral neurology practice focus were surveyed by self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Survey respondents were 420 providers (response rate 48%), and 88% reported at least monthly encounters with patients experiencing mild cognitive symptoms. Most respondents recognize MCI as a clinical diagnosis (90%) and use its diagnostic code for billing purposes (70%). When seeing these patients, most respondents routinely provide counseling on physical (78%) and mental exercise (75%) and communicate about dementia risk (63%); fewer provide information on support services (27%) or a written summary of findings (15%). Most (70%) prescribe cholinesterase inhibitors at least sometimes for this population, with memantine (39%) and other agents (e.g., vitamin E) prescribed less frequently. Respondents endorsed several benefits of a diagnosis of MCI: 1) involving the patient in planning for the future (87%); 2) motivating risk reduction activities (85%); 3) helping with financial planning (72%); and 4) prescribing medications (65%). Some respondents noted drawbacks, including 1) too difficult to diagnose (23%); 2) better described as early Alzheimer disease (21%); and 3) diagnosis can cause unnecessary worry (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mild cognitive symptoms are commonly seen by neurologists, who view MCI as a useful diagnostic category. Information and treatments provided to patients with MCI vary significantly, suggesting a need for practice guidelines and further research on clinical decision-making with this population.
OBJECTIVE: To assess how neurologists view mild cognitive impairment (MCI) as a clinical diagnosis and how they treat patients with mild cognitive symptoms. METHODS: Members of the American Academy of Neurology with an aging, dementia, or behavioral neurology practice focus were surveyed by self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Survey respondents were 420 providers (response rate 48%), and 88% reported at least monthly encounters with patients experiencing mild cognitive symptoms. Most respondents recognize MCI as a clinical diagnosis (90%) and use its diagnostic code for billing purposes (70%). When seeing these patients, most respondents routinely provide counseling on physical (78%) and mental exercise (75%) and communicate about dementia risk (63%); fewer provide information on support services (27%) or a written summary of findings (15%). Most (70%) prescribe cholinesterase inhibitors at least sometimes for this population, with memantine (39%) and other agents (e.g., vitamin E) prescribed less frequently. Respondents endorsed several benefits of a diagnosis of MCI: 1) involving the patient in planning for the future (87%); 2) motivating risk reduction activities (85%); 3) helping with financial planning (72%); and 4) prescribing medications (65%). Some respondents noted drawbacks, including 1) too difficult to diagnose (23%); 2) better described as early Alzheimer disease (21%); and 3) diagnosis can cause unnecessary worry (20%). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with mild cognitive symptoms are commonly seen by neurologists, who view MCI as a useful diagnostic category. Information and treatments provided to patients with MCI vary significantly, suggesting a need for practice guidelines and further research on clinical decision-making with this population.
Authors: F Portet; P J Ousset; P J Visser; G B Frisoni; F Nobili; Ph Scheltens; B Vellas; J Touchon Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2006-03-20 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ronald C Petersen; Ronald G Thomas; Michael Grundman; David Bennett; Rachelle Doody; Steven Ferris; Douglas Galasko; Shelia Jin; Jeffrey Kaye; Allan Levey; Eric Pfeiffer; Mary Sano; Christopher H van Dyck; Leon J Thal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-04-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael Grundman; Ronald C Petersen; Steven H Ferris; Ronald G Thomas; Paul S Aisen; David A Bennett; Norman L Foster; Clifford R Jack; Douglas R Galasko; Rachelle Doody; Jeffrey Kaye; Mary Sano; Richard Mohs; Serge Gauthier; Hyun T Kim; Shelia Jin; Arlan N Schultz; Kimberly Schafer; Ruth Mulnard; Christopher H van Dyck; Jacobo Mintzer; Edward Y Zamrini; Deborah Cahn-Weiner; Leon J Thal Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2004-01
Authors: Wenjun Li; L Tugan Muftuler; Gang Chen; B Douglas Ward; Matthew D Budde; Jennifer L Jones; Malgorzata B Franczak; Piero G Antuono; Shi-Jiang Li; Joseph S Goveas Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Wenjun Li; B Douglas Ward; Xiaolin Liu; Gang Chen; Jennifer L Jones; Piero G Antuono; Shi-Jiang Li; Joseph S Goveas Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Jee-Young Han; Lilah M Besser; Chengjie Xiong; Walter A Kukull; John C Morris Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2019 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Jenny E Ostergren; Steven G Heeringa; Carlos F Mendes de Leon; Cathleen M Connell; J Scott Roberts Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 2.035
Authors: Jie Shi; Cynthia M Stonnington; Paul M Thompson; Kewei Chen; Boris Gutman; Cole Reschke; Leslie C Baxter; Eric M Reiman; Richard J Caselli; Yalin Wang Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-10-05 Impact factor: 6.556