Literature DB >> 20679548

Intra-arrest transnasal evaporative cooling: a randomized, prehospital, multicenter study (PRINCE: Pre-ROSC IntraNasal Cooling Effectiveness).

Maaret Castrén1, Per Nordberg, Leif Svensson, Fabio Taccone, Jean-Louise Vincent, Didier Desruelles, Frank Eichwede, Pierre Mols, Tilmann Schwab, Michel Vergnion, Christian Storm, Antonio Pesenti, Jan Pachl, Fabien Guérisse, Thomas Elste, Markus Roessler, Harald Fritz, Pieterjan Durnez, Hans-Jörg Busch, Becky Inderbitzen, Denise Barbut.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transnasal evaporative cooling has sufficient heat transfer capacity for effective intra-arrest cooling and improves survival in swine. The aim of this study was to determine the safety, feasibility, and cooling efficacy of prehospital transnasal cooling in humans and to explore its effects on neurologically intact survival to hospital discharge. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Witnessed cardiac arrest patients with a treatment interval <or=20 minutes were randomized to intra-arrest cooling with a RhinoChill device (treatment group, n=96) versus standard care (control group, n=104). The final analysis included 93 versus 101 patients, respectively. Both groups were cooled after hospital arrival. The patients had similar demographics, initial rhythms, rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and intervals to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and arrival of advanced life support personnel. Eighteen device-related adverse events (1 periorbital emphysema, 3 epistaxis, 1 perioral bleed, and 13 nasal discolorations) were reported. Time to target temperature of 34 degrees C was shorter in the treatment group for both tympanic (102 versus 282 minutes, P=0.03) and core (155 versus 284 minutes, P=0.13) temperature. There were no significant differences in rates of return of spontaneous circulation between the groups (38% in treated subjects versus 43% in control subjects, P=0.48), in overall survival of those admitted alive (44% versus 31%, respectively, P=0.26), or in neurologically intact survival to discharge (Pittsburgh cerebral performance category scale 1 to 2, 34% versus 21%, P=0.21), although the study was not adequately powered to detect changes in these outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital intra-arrest transnasal cooling is safe and feasible and is associated with a significant improvement in the time intervals required to cool patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20679548     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.931691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  78 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic hypothermia for acute neurological injuries.

Authors:  Lucia Rivera-Lara; Jiaying Zhang; Susanne Muehlschlegel
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  Safety evaluation of nasopharyngeal cooling (RhinoChill®) in stroke patients: an observational study.

Authors:  Sven Poli; Jan Purrucker; Miriam Priglinger; Marek Sykora; Jennifer Diedler; André Rupp; Cem Bulut; Werner Hacke; Christian Hametner
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Rapid Induction of Therapeutic Hypothermia Using Transnasal High Flow Dry Air.

Authors:  Raghuram Chava; Menekhem Zviman; Madhavan Srinivas Raghavan; Henry Halperin; Farhan Maqbool; Romergryko Geocadin; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Benjamin A Rosen; Harikrishna Tandri
Journal:  Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 1.286

Review 4.  Non-pharmaceutical therapies for stroke: mechanisms and clinical implications.

Authors:  Fan Chen; Zhifeng Qi; Yuming Luo; Taylor Hinchliffe; Guanghong Ding; Ying Xia; Xunming Ji
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Brain temperature in volunteers subjected to intranasal cooling.

Authors:  L Covaciu; J Weis; C Bengtsson; M Allers; A Lunderquist; H Ahlström; S Rubertsson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Cold fluids during cardiac arrest: faster cooling but not better outcome!

Authors:  Alain Cariou; Kjetil Sunde
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  What is the use of hypothermia for neuroprotection after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?

Authors:  Francis Kim; Paco E Bravo; Graham Nichol
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Efficacy and Safety of Transnasal CoolStat Cooling Device to Induce and Maintain Hypothermia.

Authors:  Fabrizio R Assis; M Emma G Bigelow; Raghuram Chava; Sunjeet Sidhu; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Henry Halperin; Harikrishna Tandri
Journal:  Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 1.286

9.  Is faster still better in therapeutic hypothermia?

Authors:  Daniel Howes; David W Messenger
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Therapeutic Hypothermia after Perioperative Cardiac Arrest in Cardiac Surgical Patients.

Authors:  Thomas W Rinehart; Matthias J Merkel; Peter M Schulman; Michael P Hutchens
Journal:  ICU Dir       Date:  2012-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.