Literature DB >> 20679514

A two-pathway analysis of meiotic crossing over and gene conversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Franklin W Stahl1, Henriette M Foss.   

Abstract

Several apparently paradoxical observations regarding meiotic crossing over and gene conversion are readily resolved in a framework that recognizes the existence of two recombination pathways that differ in mismatch repair, structures of intermediates, crossover interference, and the generation of noncrossovers. One manifestation of these differences is that simultaneous gene conversion on both sides of a recombination-initiating DNA double-strand break ("two-sidedness") characterizes only one of the two pathways and is promoted by mismatch repair. Data from previous work are analyzed quantitatively within this framework, and a molecular model for meiotic double-strand break repair based on the concept of sliding D-loops is offered as an efficient scheme for visualizing the salient results from studies of crossing over and gene conversion, the molecular structures of recombination intermediates, and the biochemical competencies of the proteins involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20679514      PMCID: PMC2954474          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.121194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  70 in total

1.  Multiple functions of MutS- and MutL-related heterocomplexes.

Authors:  T Nakagawa; A Datta; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evolutionary origin, diversification and specialization of eukaryotic MutS homolog mismatch repair proteins.

Authors:  K M Culligan; G Meyer-Gauen; J Lyons-Weiler; J B Hays
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination.

Authors:  N Hunter; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-07-13       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  hMSH4-hMSH5 recognizes Holliday Junctions and forms a meiosis-specific sliding clamp that embraces homologous chromosomes.

Authors:  Timothy Snowden; Samir Acharya; Charles Butz; Mark Berardini; Richard Fishel
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  But see KITANI (1978).

Authors:  Franklin W Stahl; Henriette M Foss
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Interaction of genetic and environmental factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiosis: the devil is in the details.

Authors:  Victoria E Cotton; Eva R Hoffmann; Mohammed F F Abdullah; Rhona H Borts
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

7.  Corresponding-site interference, synaptinemal complex structure, and 8+:0m and 7+:1m octads from wild-type x mutant crosses of Ascobolus immersus.

Authors:  B C Lamb; M R Wickramaratne
Journal:  J Chem Soc Perkin 1       Date:  1974

8.  Conserved properties between functionally distinct MutS homologs in yeast.

Authors:  P Pochart; D Woltering; N M Hollingsworth
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-11-28       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Pâques; J E Haber
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.056

10.  Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance.

Authors:  E Foss; R Lande; F W Stahl; C M Steinberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  11 in total

1.  A crossover hotspot near his-3 in Neurospora crassa is a preferential recombination termination site.

Authors:  P J Yeadon; F J Bowring; D E A Catcheside
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 3.291

2.  Serendipity and the times.

Authors:  Franklin Frank W Stahl
Journal:  Bacteriophage       Date:  2015-06-09

3.  Use of fluorescent protein to analyse recombination at three loci in Neurospora crassa.

Authors:  Frederick J Bowring; P Jane Yeadon; David E A Catcheside
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 3.495

4.  Repeated strand invasion and extensive branch migration are hallmarks of meiotic recombination.

Authors:  Jasvinder S Ahuja; Catherine S Harvey; David L Wheeler; Michael Lichten
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 19.328

5.  Crossover patterning by the beam-film model: analysis and implications.

Authors:  Liangran Zhang; Zhangyi Liang; John Hutchinson; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis.

Authors:  Francesca Cole; Liisa Kauppi; Julian Lange; Ignasi Roig; Raymond Wang; Scott Keeney; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  Defining and detecting crossover-interference mutants in yeast.

Authors:  Frank Stahl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Transmission distortion affecting human noncrossover but not crossover recombination: a hidden source of meiotic drive.

Authors:  Linda Odenthal-Hesse; Ingrid L Berg; Amelia Veselis; Alec J Jeffreys; Celia A May
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  The genomic landscape of meiotic crossovers and gene conversions in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Erik Wijnker; Geo Velikkakam James; Jia Ding; Frank Becker; Jonas R Klasen; Vimal Rawat; Beth A Rowan; Daniël F de Jong; C Bastiaan de Snoo; Luis Zapata; Bruno Huettel; Hans de Jong; Stephan Ossowski; Detlef Weigel; Maarten Koornneef; Joost Jb Keurentjes; Korbinian Schneeberger
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Meiotic Recombination in Neurospora crassa Proceeds by Two Pathways with Extensive Holliday Junction Migration.

Authors:  Patricia Jane Yeadon; Frederick James Bowring; David E A Catcheside
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.