PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) in the differentiation of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) from iodinated contrast material in patients who received contrast material via intraarterial or intravenous delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the local institutional review board, which waived the informed consent requirement for the analysis. Sixteen patients with acute stroke and two with head trauma who had undergone intraarterial or intravenous administration of iodinated contrast material were evaluated by using dual-energy CT to differentiate areas of hyperattenuation secondary to contrast material staining from those representing ICH. A dual-energy CT scanner was used for imaging at 80 and 140 kV, and a three-material decomposition algorithm was used to obtain virtual unenhanced images and iodine overlay images. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of dual-energy CT in the prospective differentiation of intraparenchymal contrast material from hemorrhage were obtained. Follow-up images were used as the standard of reference. RESULTS: There were 28 intraparenchymal areas of hyperattenuation classified at dual-energy CT as iodinated contrast material staining (n = 20, 71%), hemorrhage (n = 5, 18%), or both (n = 3, 11%). Two of the three areas of hyperattenuation seen on both virtual unenhanced and iodine overlay images were related to mineralization. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of dual-energy CT in the identification of hemorrhage were 100% (six of six areas), 91% (20 of 22 areas), and 93% (26 of 28 areas), respectively. CONCLUSION: Dual-energy CT can help differentiate ICH from iodinated contrast material staining with high sensitivity and specificity in patients who have recently received intraarterial or intravenous iodinated contrast material.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) in the differentiation of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) from iodinated contrast material in patients who received contrast material via intraarterial or intravenous delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the local institutional review board, which waived the informed consent requirement for the analysis. Sixteen patients with acute stroke and two with head trauma who had undergone intraarterial or intravenous administration of iodinated contrast material were evaluated by using dual-energy CT to differentiate areas of hyperattenuation secondary to contrast material staining from those representing ICH. A dual-energy CT scanner was used for imaging at 80 and 140 kV, and a three-material decomposition algorithm was used to obtain virtual unenhanced images and iodine overlay images. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of dual-energy CT in the prospective differentiation of intraparenchymal contrast material from hemorrhage were obtained. Follow-up images were used as the standard of reference. RESULTS: There were 28 intraparenchymal areas of hyperattenuation classified at dual-energy CT as iodinated contrast material staining (n = 20, 71%), hemorrhage (n = 5, 18%), or both (n = 3, 11%). Two of the three areas of hyperattenuation seen on both virtual unenhanced and iodine overlay images were related to mineralization. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of dual-energy CT in the identification of hemorrhage were 100% (six of six areas), 91% (20 of 22 areas), and 93% (26 of 28 areas), respectively. CONCLUSION: Dual-energy CT can help differentiate ICH from iodinated contrast material staining with high sensitivity and specificity in patients who have recently received intraarterial or intravenous iodinated contrast material.
Authors: Vitor Mendes Pereira; Maria Isabel Vargas; Ana Marcos; Philippe Bijlenga; Ana Paula Narata; Sven Haller; Karl-Olof Lövblad Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2013-11-28
Authors: Andrea Morotti; Javier M Romero; Michael J Jessel; Andrew M Hernandez; Anastasia Vashkevich; Kristin Schwab; Joseph D Burns; Qaisar A Shah; Thomas A Bergman; M Fareed K Suri; Mustapha Ezzeddine; Jawad F Kirmani; Sachin Agarwal; Angela Hays Shapshak; Steven R Messe; Chitra Venkatasubramanian; Katherine Palmieri; Christopher Lewandowski; Tiffany R Chang; Ira Chang; David Z Rose; Wade Smith; Chung Y Hsu; Chun-Lin Liu; Li-Ming Lien; Chen-Yu Hsiao; Toru Iwama; Mohammad Rauf Afzal; Christy Cassarly; Steven M Greenberg; Renee' Hebert Martin; Adnan I Qureshi; Jonathan Rosand; John M Boone; Joshua N Goldstein Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: F B Cabral; L H Castro-Afonso; G S Nakiri; L M Monsignore; Src Fábio; A C Dos Santos; O M Pontes-Neto; D G Abud Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2017-09-26 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Tommaso D'Angelo; Giuseppe Cicero; Silvio Mazziotti; Giorgio Ascenti; Moritz H Albrecht; Simon S Martin; Ahmed E Othman; Thomas J Vogl; Julian L Wichmann Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Matthias P Fabritius; Philipp M Kazmierczak; Kolja M Thierfelder; Wolfgang G Kunz Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2017-03-02 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: A Morotti; J M Romero; M J Jessel; H B Brouwers; R Gupta; K Schwab; A Vashkevich; A Ayres; C D Anderson; M E Gurol; A Viswanathan; S M Greenberg; J Rosand; J N Goldstein Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 3.825