Norman A Poole1, Axel Wuerz, Niruj Agrawal. 1. St Bartholomew's Hospital, East London Foundation Trust, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK. norman.poole@googlemail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The value of drug interviews in the treatment of conversion disorder is at present unknown. AIMS: To review all the available papers published in English that report on the use of drug interviews for treating conversion/dissociative disorder. METHOD: Databases (including EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO) were searched from 1920 to 2009. Selected publications had to report on the use of drug interviews in people diagnosed with a conversion/dissociative disorder. Qualitative and quantitative data were extracted. Predictors of a positive response were ascertained using meta-analytic techniques. RESULTS: Fifty-five papers meeting inclusion criteria were identified. No studies compared the intervention with a suitable control group. However, two studies reported high response rates when drug interview was used in individuals with treatment-resistant conversion disorder. In the meta-analysis, the use of suggestion and occurrence of emotional catharsis during the interview were positively associated with recovery. Combining two medications and comorbid psychiatric disorder were negatively associated with recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for effectiveness of drug interviews is of poor quality but it may be of benefit in the treatment of acute and treatment-resistant conversion disorder. A proactive approach during the interview, making suggestions the individual will respond, could influence outcome. Comorbid psychiatric disorder should be treated conventionally. Experimental studies to determine efficacy are required.
BACKGROUND: The value of drug interviews in the treatment of conversion disorder is at present unknown. AIMS: To review all the available papers published in English that report on the use of drug interviews for treating conversion/dissociative disorder. METHOD: Databases (including EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO) were searched from 1920 to 2009. Selected publications had to report on the use of drug interviews in people diagnosed with a conversion/dissociative disorder. Qualitative and quantitative data were extracted. Predictors of a positive response were ascertained using meta-analytic techniques. RESULTS: Fifty-five papers meeting inclusion criteria were identified. No studies compared the intervention with a suitable control group. However, two studies reported high response rates when drug interview was used in individuals with treatment-resistant conversion disorder. In the meta-analysis, the use of suggestion and occurrence of emotional catharsis during the interview were positively associated with recovery. Combining two medications and comorbid psychiatric disorder were negatively associated with recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for effectiveness of drug interviews is of poor quality but it may be of benefit in the treatment of acute and treatment-resistant conversion disorder. A proactive approach during the interview, making suggestions the individual will respond, could influence outcome. Comorbid psychiatric disorder should be treated conventionally. Experimental studies to determine efficacy are required.
Authors: Jeannette M Gelauff; Yasmine E M Dreissen; Marina A J Tijssen; Jon Stone Journal: Curr Treat Options Neurol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Benjamin Stewart; Jon G Dean; Adriana Koek; Jason Chua; Rafael Wabl; Kayla Martin; Naveed Davoodian; Christopher Becker; Mai Himedan; Amanda Kim; Roger Albin; Kelvin L Chou; Vikas Kotagal Journal: Pharmacol Res Perspect Date: 2020-12