Literature DB >> 20678806

A cross-sectional study of the current treatment patterns in noninfectious uveitis among specialists in the United States.

Quan Dong Nguyen1, Elham Hatef, Brian Kayen, Cynthia P Macahilig, Mohamed Ibrahim, Jianmin Wang, Ovais Shaikh, Bahram Bodaghi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Corticosteroids (CS) are the only approved drug class for treatment of noninfectious uveitis by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Serious side effects are associated with chronic use of systemic CS; established guidelines recommend the use of steroid-sparing agents if control of uveitis cannot be achieved with ≤ 10 mg/day of prednisone (or equivalent) within 3 months. This study evaluated the treatment patterns among physicians who routinely manage patients with noninfectious uveitis to determine how treatment guidelines are followed.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional, multicenter study conducted across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty ophthalmologists and 3 rheumatologists were recruited using payer reimbursement International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes.
METHODS: Patient data were reported using a study-specific questionnaire. Physicians were also asked if they were aware of or used recommended treatment guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uveitis treatment patterns were compared with guidelines.
RESULTS: Physicians managed a mean of 5555 patients; patients with uveitis who required systemic CS treatment comprised approximately 5% of each physician's practice. A total of 580 patients with noninfectious uveitis were randomly selected for analyses. Anterior uveitis requiring systemic therapy was diagnosed in 168 patients (29%), intermediate uveitis was diagnosed in 140 patients (24%), posterior uveitis was diagnosed in 150 patients (26%), and panuveitis was diagnosed in 122 patients (21%); 199 patients (34%) had active disease. The mean time interval from the diagnosis of uveitis to the time of survey was 3.1 to 4.5 years. A systemic disorder was associated with uveitis in 16% to 54% of patients; 57% to 100% of patients received systemic immunosuppressive therapy. In all, 360 of 580 patients (62%) received systemic CS, with a mean initial daily dose of 44 mg, tapered to 34 mg prednisone (or equivalent) as maintenance dose. Among physicians surveyed, 75% did not use or were not aware of treatment guidelines for uveitis.
CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals that the majority of physicians surveyed are not familiar with or do not adhere to currently recommended guidelines for management of uveitis. High CS doses are used to maintain control of disease, and there is a low level of awareness of recommended guidelines to treat noninfectious uveitis. The finding underscores the need to place further emphasis on educating the medical community and reinforcing treatment guidelines to improve the care of patients with uveitis.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20678806     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  29 in total

1.  The Effect of Different Dosing Schedules of Intravitreal Sirolimus, a Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Inhibitor, in the Treatment of Non-Infectious Uveitis (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Authors:  Quan Dong Nguyen; Mohammad Ali Sadiq; Mohamed Kamel Soliman; Aniruddha Agarwal; Diana V Do; Yasir J Sepah
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2016-08

Review 2.  Targets of immunomodulation in bacterial endophthalmitis.

Authors:  Frederick C Miller; Phillip S Coburn; Mursalin Md Huzzatul; Austin L LaGrow; Erin Livingston; Michelle C Callegan
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 3.  The Eyes Have it: A Rheumatologist's View of Uveitis.

Authors:  James T Rosenbaum; Andrew D Dick
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 10.995

Review 4.  Immunosuppression for the Uveitides.

Authors:  Douglas A Jabs
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 5.  Uveitis: contrasting the approaches in Japan and the United States.

Authors:  James T Rosenbaum
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  Current concepts and future directions in the pathogenesis and treatment of non-infectious intraocular inflammation.

Authors:  R W J Lee; A D Dick
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Piceatannol suppresses endotoxin-induced ocular inflammation in rats.

Authors:  Nilesh M Kalariya; Mohammad Shoeb; Aramati B M Reddy; Rahul Sawhney; Kota V Ramana
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.932

Review 8.  Immunopharmacotherapy of non-infectious uveitis: where do we stand?

Authors:  Rupesh Agrawal; Cecilia Lee; Sumita Phatak; Carlos Pavesio
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 4.388

9.  Association Between Long-Lasting Intravitreous Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant vs Systemic Anti-inflammatory Therapy and Visual Acuity at 7 Years Among Patients With Intermediate, Posterior, or Panuveitis.

Authors:  John H Kempen; Michael M Altaweel; Janet T Holbrook; Elizabeth A Sugar; Jennifer E Thorne; Douglas A Jabs
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Corticosteroid-sparing therapy: practice patterns among uveitis specialists.

Authors:  Elizabeth Esterberg; Nisha R Acharya
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect       Date:  2011-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.