Literature DB >> 20678766

Identifying predictors of early non-recovery in a compensation setting: The Whiplash Outcome Study.

Petrina P Casey1, Anne Marie Feyer, Ian D Cameron.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: People with Whiplash Associated Disorder (WAD) often experience pain and disability for extended periods of time. A large proportion of these people will seek treatment through a compensation process. Rarely is data related to people's health collected within the compensation process making it difficult to identify those that are at risk of delayed recovery and appropriately direct interventions. STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare people with WAD who have recovered with those that have not, within 3 months of injury and identify potential predictors of poorer health and non-recovery to inform claim screening processes. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: People who sustained a WAD and claimed compensation within an Australian Motor Accidents Compensation Scheme between November 2007 and June 2009. MEASURE OF RECOVERY: Functional Rating Index (FRI) score (25). HEALTH OUTCOME MEASURES: Short Form 36 (SF36), FRI, and the Pain Catastrophising Scale (PCS).
METHODS: 246 people who had lodged a claim for compensation were enrolled in the Whiplash Outcome Study within 3 months of sustaining a WAD injury. Participants were assigned to a recovered or non recovered group and analysed for differences between the two groups. Multiple linear regression models were used to identify potential predictors of poorer health and non-recovery.
RESULTS: Overall 23% of the study population had recovered within 3 months of sustaining a WAD, whilst only 9% had finalised their insurance claim. The recovered group had significantly better scores on all health outcome measures; SF36 Physical Component Score, SF36 Mental Component Score and the PCS(p < 0.001). The significant independent predictors of poorer health and non-recovery were helplessness(p < 0.001), older age (p < 0.001) and pre-injury work status being affected (p < 0.001) (r(2) = .624).Regardless of the health outcome measure used, helplessness was significantly associated with poorer reported health.
CONCLUSION: Including additional information at claim notification, specifically the PCS and information on the effect the injury has on the working population could significantly improve claim screening processes, identifying those with poorer health and risk of non-recovery. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20678766     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.07.234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  8 in total

1.  Changing insurance company claims handling processes improves some outcomes for people injured in road traffic crashes.

Authors:  Frederieke Schaafsma; Annelies De Wolf; Areen Kayaian; Ian D Cameron
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  The association between seeking financial compensation and injury recovery following motor vehicle related orthopaedic trauma.

Authors:  Darnel F Murgatroyd; Ian A Harris; Yvonne Tran; Ian D Cameron
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Restriction in functioning and quality of life is common in people 2 months after compensable motor vehicle crashes: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jagnoor Jagnoor; Annelies De Wolf; Michael Nicholas; Chris G Maher; Petrina Casey; Fiona Blyth; Ian A Harris; Ian D Cameron
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-21

4.  Biopsychosocial factors associated with non-recovery after a minor transport-related injury: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Stella Samoborec; Rasa Ruseckaite; Lorena Romero; Sue M Evans
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Biopsychosocial barriers affecting recovery after a minor transport-related injury: A qualitative study from Victoria.

Authors:  Stella Samoborec; Darshini Ayton; Rasa Ruseckaite; Susan M Evans
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Multidimensional associative factors for improvement in pain, function, and working capacity after rehabilitation of whiplash associated disorder: a prognostic, prospective outcome study.

Authors:  Felix Angst; Andreas R Gantenbein; Susanne Lehmann; Françoise Gysi-Klaus; André Aeschlimann; Beat A Michel; Frank Hegemann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Biopsychosocial factors associated with non-recovery after a minor transport-related injury: A systematic review.

Authors:  Stella Samoborec; Rasa Ruseckaite; Darshini Ayton; Sue Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Is Delayed Surgery After Unsuccessful Conservative Treatment Beneficial for Spinal Cord Injury Following Whiplash? A Retrospective Study in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Tengfei Zhao; Bolaky Landish Yishmaan; Dasheng Lin; Kan Xu; Qiankun Zhou; Ge Yang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-05-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.