Literature DB >> 20678703

Single-stage anterior cruciate ligament revision with bone-patellar tendon-bone: a case-control series of revision of failed synthetic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Yasuo Niki1, Hideo Matsumoto, Hiroyuki Enomoto, Yoshiaki Toyama, Yasunori Suda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical results of single-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) after synthetic ligament failure.
METHODS: The subjects comprised 20 patients who underwent revision ACLR after synthetic ligament failure. All revisions were performed with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft, and bone tunnel expansion after removal of synthetic materials was treated with bone plugs sized and trimmed as necessary to fill the bone tunnels. Clinical results were assessed at a mean of 2.8 years postoperatively, followed by comparison with the results of 20 primary ACLRs selected as case-matched controls. Assessment included the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation, instrumented laxity testing, and radiologic examination.
RESULTS: Bone tunnel enlargement to 11 mm in diameter or greater was found in 10 of 20 revision ACLRs. However, favorable anteroposterior stability was obtained at final follow-up (1.4 +/- 2.0 mm in revision ACLR group and 1.5 +/- 1.5 mm in primary ACLR group). The overall Lysholm score improved significantly from preoperatively to final follow-up, but the revision ACLR group showed significantly worse results for the pain parameter than the primary ACLR group. The final IKDC results also showed significant postoperative improvement, but the number of cases with grade C was significantly higher in the revision ACLR group than in the primary ACLR group, which was attributed to radiologically confirmed osteoarthritis in the revision ACLR group.
CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage revision ACLR with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft after synthetic ligament failure yielded favorable results in terms of IKDC grade, Lysholm score, and anteroposterior stability, despite enlarged bone tunnels after removal of synthetic material. Inferior results for the radiologic and pain parameters of the IKDC and Lysholm scores were attributed to osteoarthritic changes inherent to the revision ACLR group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic case-control study. 2010 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20678703     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  6 in total

1.  Factors affecting anterior knee pain following anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki; Akihiro Hakozaki; Wataru Iwamoto; Hiroya Kanagawa; Hideo Matsumoto; Yoshiaki Toyama; Yasunori Suda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Margherita Ricci; Francesco Della Villa; Stefano Della Villa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  One-stage revision ACL reconstruction after primary ACL double bundle reconstruction: is bone-patella tendon-bone autograft reliable?

Authors:  Tomohiro Tomihara; Yusuke Hashimoto; Masatoshi Taniuchi; Junsei Takigami; Changhun Han; Nagakazu Shimada
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Inferior results after revision ACL reconstructions: a comparison with primary ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Jon Olav Drogset; Annja Viset; Torbjørn Grøntvedt; Grete Sofie Hortemo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  What Is the Mid-term Failure Rate of Revision ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Christopher Kim; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Stefano Zaffagnini; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Does Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Provide Similar Clinical Outcomes to Primary ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xu Yan; Xiong-Gang Yang; Jiang-Tao Feng; Bin Liu; Yong-Cheng Hu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.071

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.