BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Results of studies on genetic polymorphisms of ERCC1 gene in DNA repair pathway which may affect response to platinum-based chemotherapy and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer are conflicting. The aim of this study is to prospectively assess the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms of C8092A and codon118 in ERCC1 and drug response in 90 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS: All patients were treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Genotypes of ERCC1 C8092A and codon118 were examined by sequencing, and the association between genotypes and response was evaluated. RESULTS: Genotype frequencies of ERCC1 C8092A were CC 40.0% (36/90), CA 48.9% (44/90) and AA 11.1% (10/90), frequencies of codon118 were CC 58.9% (53/90), CT 34.4% (31/90) and TT 6.7% (6/90). There was no significant difference in response rate of patients carrying with CC, compared with CA plus AA in C8092A (33.3% vs 29.6%, P = 0.71). Response rate of patients carrying with CC in ERCC1 118 was 32.1%, 24.3% with CT plus CC (P = 0.43). There was no difference in progression free survival between patients carrying with CC and CT plus TT in C8092A (5.2 months vs 5.4 months, P = 0.62). There was no difference in progression free survival between patients carrying with CC and CA plus AA (5.5 months vs 5.3 months, P = 0.59). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that there is no association between polymorphisms in ERCC1 C8092A and codon118 and response in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Results of studies on genetic polymorphisms of ERCC1 gene in DNA repair pathway which may affect response to platinum-based chemotherapy and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer are conflicting. The aim of this study is to prospectively assess the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms of C8092A and codon118 in ERCC1 and drug response in 90 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS: All patients were treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Genotypes of ERCC1C8092A and codon118 were examined by sequencing, and the association between genotypes and response was evaluated. RESULTS: Genotype frequencies of ERCC1C8092A were CC 40.0% (36/90), CA 48.9% (44/90) and AA 11.1% (10/90), frequencies of codon118 were CC 58.9% (53/90), CT 34.4% (31/90) and TT 6.7% (6/90). There was no significant difference in response rate of patients carrying with CC, compared with CA plus AA in C8092A (33.3% vs 29.6%, P = 0.71). Response rate of patients carrying with CC in ERCC1 118 was 32.1%, 24.3% with CT plus CC (P = 0.43). There was no difference in progression free survival between patients carrying with CC and CT plus TT in C8092A (5.2 months vs 5.4 months, P = 0.62). There was no difference in progression free survival between patients carrying with CC and CA plus AA (5.5 months vs 5.3 months, P = 0.59). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that there is no association between polymorphisms in ERCC1C8092A and codon118 and response in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
Genotype frequencies in patients with advanced NSCLC and response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy according to combination of genotype in C8092A and 118
C8092A
118
No. of patients (n/%)
P
n
CR+PR
SD+PD
*Fisher’ Exact Test.
CC
CC
15 (16.7)
7 (46.7)
8 (53.3)
CC
CT+TT
21 (23.3)
3 (14.3)
18 (85.7)
CA+AA
CC
38 (42.2)
10 (26.3)
28 (73.7)
CA+AA
CT+TT
16 (17.8)
6 (37.5)
10 (62.5)
0.12*
晚期NSCLC患者ERCC1C8092A、118多态性与含铂化疗疗效的关系Genotype frequencies in patients with advanced NSCLC and response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy according to genotype晚期NSCLC患者ERCC1C8092A、118多态联合与含铂化疗疗效的关系Genotype frequencies in patients with advanced NSCLC and response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy according to combination of genotype in C8092A and 118
Authors: R de las Peñas; M Sanchez-Ronco; V Alberola; M Taron; C Camps; R Garcia-Carbonero; B Massuti; C Queralt; M Botia; R Garcia-Gomez; D Isla; M Cobo; M Santarpia; F Cecere; P Mendez; J J Sanchez; R Rosell Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2006-01-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Carmelo Tibaldi; Elisa Giovannetti; Enrico Vasile; Valentina Mey; Adrie C Laan; Sara Nannizzi; Roberta Di Marsico; Andrea Antonuzzo; Cinzia Orlandini; Simona Ricciardi; Mario Del Tacca; Godefridus J Peters; Alfredo Falcone; Romano Danesi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: D Isla; C Sarries; R Rosell; G Alonso; M Domine; M Taron; G Lopez-Vivanco; C Camps; M Botia; L Nuñez; M Sanchez-Ronco; J J Sanchez; M Lopez-Brea; I Barneto; A Paredes; B Medina; A Artal; P Lianes Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: David R Gandara; Tomoya Kawaguchi; John Crowley; James Moon; Kiyoyuki Furuse; Masaaki Kawahara; Satoshi Teramukai; Yuichiro Ohe; Kaoru Kubota; Stephen K Williamson; Oliver Gautschi; Heinz Josef Lenz; Howard L McLeod; Primo N Lara; Charles Arthur Coltman; Masahiro Fukuoka; Nagahiro Saijo; Masanori Fukushima; Philip C Mack Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Aristea Kalikaki; Maria Kanaki; Helen Vassalou; John Souglakos; Alexandra Voutsina; Vassilis Georgoulias; Dimitris Mavroudis Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Wei Zhou; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Geoffrey Liu; Sohee Park; Donna S Neuberg; John C Wain; Thomas J Lynch; Li Su; David C Christiani Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 12.531