Literature DB >> 20677285

Validation of a current definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients and analysis of risk factors.

Kim M Olthoff1, Laura Kulik, Benjamin Samstein, Mary Kaminski, Michael Abecassis, Jean Emond, Abraham Shaked, Jason D Christie.   

Abstract

Translational studies in liver transplantation often require an endpoint of graft function or dysfunction beyond graft loss. Prior definitions of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) vary, and none have been validated in a large multicenter population in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) era. We examined an updated definition of EAD to validate previously used criteria, and correlated this definition with graft and patient outcome. We performed a cohort study of 300 deceased donor liver transplants at 3 U.S. programs. EAD was defined as the presence of one or more of the following previously defined postoperative laboratory analyses reflective of liver injury and function: bilirubin >or=10mg/dL on day 7, international normalized ratio >or=1.6 on day 7, and alanine or aspartate aminotransferases >2000 IU/L within the first 7 days. To assess predictive validity, the EAD definition was tested for association with graft and patient survival. Risk factors for EAD were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Overall incidence of EAD was 23.2%. Most grafts met the definition with increased bilirubin at day 7 or high levels of aminotransferases. Of recipients meeting the EAD definition, 18.8% died, as opposed to 1.8% of recipients without EAD (relative risk = 10.7 [95% confidence interval: 3.6, 31.9] P < 0.0001). More recipients with EAD lost their grafts (26.1%) than recipients with no EAD (3.5%) (relative risk = 7.4 [95% confidence interval: 3.4, 16.3] P < 0.0001). Donor age and MELD score were significant EAD risk factors in a multivariate model. In summary a simple definition of EAD using objective posttransplant criteria identified a 23% incidence, and was highly associated with graft loss and patient mortality, validating previously published criteria. This definition can be used as an endpoint in translational studies aiming to identify mechanistic pathways leading to a subgroup of liver grafts with clinical expression of suboptimal function. (c) 2010 AASLD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20677285     DOI: 10.1002/lt.22091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  193 in total

1.  Use of marginal grafts in deceased donor liver transplant: assessment of early outcomes.

Authors:  Rajesh Godara; C Sudeep Naidu; Pankaj P Rao; Sanjay Sharma; Jayant K Banerjee; Anupam Saha; Kapileshwer Vijay
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-03

2.  Serum cytokine profiles associated with early allograft dysfunction in patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Authors:  Benjamin H Friedman; Joshua H Wolf; Liqing Wang; Mary E Putt; Abraham Shaked; Jason D Christie; Wayne W Hancock; Kim M Olthoff
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Liver regeneration after living donor transplantation: adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study.

Authors:  Kim M Olthoff; Jean C Emond; Tempie H Shearon; Greg Everson; Talia B Baker; Robert A Fisher; Chris E Freise; Brenda W Gillespie; James E Everhart
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Donor PNPLA3 rs738409 genotype affects fibrosis progression in liver transplantation for hepatitis C.

Authors:  Winston Dunn; Maura O'Neil; Jie Zhao; Chuang Hong Wu; Benjamin Roberts; Shweta Chakraborty; Craig Sherman; Brandy Weaver; Ryan Taylor; Jody Olson; Mojtaba Olyaee; Richard Gilroy; Timothy Schmitt; Yu-Jui Yvonne Wan; Steven A Weinman
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Low serum factor V level: early predictor of allograft failure and death following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Mauricio C Zulian; Marcio F Chedid; Aljamir D Chedid; Tomaz J M Grezzana Filho; Ian Leipnitz; Alexandre de Araujo; Mario R Alvares-da-Silva; Mario G Cardoni; Luciano S Guimaraes; Cleber D P Kruel; Cleber R P Kruel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  A panel of biomarkers in the prediction for early allograft dysfunction and mortality after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Hsin-I Tsai; Chi-Jen Lo; Chao-Wei Lee; Jr-Rung Lin; Wei-Chen Lee; Hung-Yao Ho; Chia-Yi Tsai; Mei-Ling Cheng; Huang-Ping Yu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  Graft Reconditioning before Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Dieter P Hoyer; Thomas Minor
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-07-29

8.  Overactivation of the nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2-antioxidant response element pathway in hepatocytes decreases hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice.

Authors:  Lung-Yi Lee; Calvin Harberg; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Shelly Cook; Drew Roenneburg; Sabine Werner; Jeffrey Johnson; David P Foley
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 9.  Temporary Intraoperative Porto-Caval Shunts in Piggy-Back Liver Transplantation Reduce Intraoperative Blood Loss and Improve Postoperative Transaminases and Renal Function: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sebastian Pratschke; Alexandra Rauch; Markus Albertsmeier; Markus Rentsch; Michaela Kirschneck; Joachim Andrassy; Michael Thomas; Werner Hartwig; Joan Figueras; Juan Del Rio Martin; Nicola De Ruvo; Jens Werner; Markus Guba; Maximilian Weniger; Martin K Angele
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Predictive factors of short term outcome after liver transplantation: A review.

Authors:  Giuliano Bolondi; Federico Mocchegiani; Roberto Montalti; Daniele Nicolini; Marco Vivarelli; Lesley De Pietri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.