Literature DB >> 20676880

Metabolic response evaluation by PET during neoadjuvant treatment for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction.

A Sendler1.   

Abstract

Following several randomized trials, neoadjuvant therapy in adenocarcinoma of esophagus and the esophagogastric junction can be seen as an international standard. However, in a large proportion of patients the objective response achieved is unsatisfactory. These patients do not benefit from neoadjuvant therapy, but do suffer from toxic side effects; sometimes progressive and appropriate surgical therapy is delayed. For this reason, a diagnostic test that can accurately assess tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy might be of crucial importance. Response evaluation using CT scan, endoluminal ultrasound, or rebiopsy is not reliable. In recent times, response evaluation using 18FGD PET after and during neoadjuvant treatment is in the focus of clinical and scientific interest. Most studies have evaluated the diagnostic modalities for response to neoadjuvant treatment after completion of the treatment. Following the published data so far, FDG-PET seems to be less accurate after and during chemoradiation than after chemotherapy alone. The data of early response evaluation (14 days after the onset of chemotherapy) are very much encouraging; however, they have to be evaluated in an international randomized trial. Standardization of PET technology as well as defining the thresholds used for the estimation of early response is mandatory. So far, FDG-PET does not change treatment in esophageal and gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20676880     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-70579-6_14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res        ISSN: 0080-0015


  3 in total

1.  The value of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting the pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tao Song; Qi Yao; Jinrong Qu; Hongkai Zhang; Yan Zhao; Jianjun Qin; Wen Feng; Shouning Zhang; Xianhua Han; Shaoyu Wang; Xu Yan; Hailiang Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Apparent diffusion coefficient modifications in assessing gastro-oesophageal cancer response to neoadjuvant treatment: comparison with tumour regression grade at histology.

Authors:  Francesco De Cobelli; Francesco Giganti; Elena Orsenigo; Michaela Cellina; Antonio Esposito; Giulia Agostini; Luca Albarello; Elena Mazza; Alessandro Ambrosi; Carlo Socci; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Response evaluation after neoadjuvant chemoradiation by positron emission tomography-computed tomography for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Joon Suk Park; Joon Young Choi; Seung Hwan Moon; Yong Chan Ahn; Jeeyun Lee; Dohun Kim; Kwhanmien Kim; Young Mog Shim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 4.679

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.