Literature DB >> 20676823

[Laminoplasty].

Frank Grochulla1, Christoph Mehren, Christoph Siepe, Andreas Korge, H Michael Mayer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aims of laminoplasty are to expand the spinal canal, to secure spinal stability, and to preserve the protective function of the spine. Preservation of mobility is also a goal of this procedure for multiple-level involvement. INDICATIONS: Multisegmental spondylotic myelopathy with a relatively narrow spinal canal (anteroposterior spinal canal diameter<13 mm). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Spinal instability. Kyphotic cervical spine. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Prone positioning of the patient. Three-point pin fixation device such as Mayfield tongs to secure the head. Midline posterior approach to the spine. Exposure of the laminae and the spinous processes. Opening and expanding of the spinal canal, decompression of the spinal cord. Fixation of the laminae with bone and/or implants. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Cervical collar for 3-4 weeks.
RESULTS: Long-term investigations have shown neurological improvement in 57%, a decrease of range of motion in 36%, and a slight reduction of lordosis without clinical relevance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20676823     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-010-8084-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  5 in total

1.  Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Chiba; Yuto Ogawa; Ken Ishii; Hironari Takaishi; Masaya Nakamura; Hirofumi Maruiwa; Morio Matsumoto; Yoshiaki Toyama
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Cervical laminoplasty (Hattori's method). Procedure and follow-up results.

Authors:  S Kawai; K Sunago; K Doi; M Saika; T Taguchi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; K Watanabe; K Wakano; N Suzuki; K Satomi; Y Ishii
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review.

Authors:  John K Ratliff; Paul R Cooper
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy. A comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  K Yonenobu; N Hosono; M Iwasaki; M Asano; K Ono
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.468

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.