Literature DB >> 20676676

Phase II study of short-course capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) followed by maintenance capecitabine in advanced colorectal cancer: XelQuali study.

T Waddell1, S Gollins, W Soe, J Valle, J Allen, D Bentley, J Morris, A Lloyd, R Swindell, M B Taylor, M P Saunders.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and quality of life of a short course of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) followed by single-agent capecitabine in patients with previously untreated, inoperable, metastatic colorectal cancer.
METHODS: Patients received intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on d1 plus oral capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily (bid) on d1-14 every 21 days for four cycles. Patients achieving stable disease (SD) or better than received capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) bid on d1-14 every 21 days until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: Overall, 21/45 (47%) of patients responded to the initial XELOX chemotherapy whilst SD or better was documented in 76%. Median PFS was 6.7 (95% CI 5.7-9.6) months, and median overall survival (OS) was 20.5 (95% CI 13.1-28.1) months. In the 34 patients who then received capecitabine maintenance therapy, the median PFS was 8.1 (95% CI 6.2-11.8) months and median OS was 23.1 (95% CI 17.8-28.5) months. A marked reduction in the vast majority of all grades of adverse event occurred on switching from initial XELOX to maintenance capecitabine chemotherapy including grades 1-2 (77 vs. 47%) and grade 3 (7 vs. 3%) neuropathy, diarrhoea and lethargy.
CONCLUSIONS: Short-course XELOX followed by capecitabine maintenance therapy provides an active and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. A median OS of more than 20 months is promising and by limiting the number of oxaliplatin infusions, this approach minimises the risk of unwanted cumulative neurotoxicity, is cheaper and more convenient for both patients and healthcare providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20676676     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-010-1322-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  7 in total

Review 1.  5-Fluorouracil or capecitabine in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a pooled-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Mary Cabiddu; Sandro Barni
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Optimal Maintenance Strategy for First-Line Oxaliplatin-Containing Therapy with or without Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Toshikazu Moriwaki; Masahiko Gosho; Akinori Sugaya; Takeshi Yamada; Yoshiyuki Yamamoto; Ichinosuke Hyodo
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.679

3.  Metronomic capecitabine as maintenance treatment after first line induction with XELOX for metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Rui Geng; Gang Wang; Lei Qiu; Bing Liu; Fan Yang; Jingyu Zhang; Yongchang Miao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 4.  Meta-analysis comparing maintenance strategies with continuous therapy and complete chemotherapy-free interval strategies in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lei Zhao; Jing Wang; Huihui Li; Juanjuan Che; Bangwei Cao
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-31

5.  Expert consensus on maintenance treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer in China.

Authors:  Rui-Hua Xu; Lin Shen; Jin Li; Jian-Ming Xu; Feng Bi; Yi Ba; Li Bai; Yong-Qian Shu; Tian-Shu Liu; Yu-Hong Li; Chun-Mei Bai; Xiang-Lin Yuan; Jun Zhang; Gong Chen; Ai-Ping Zhou; Ying Yuan; Xi-Jing Wang; Xiao-Ping Qian; Yan-Hong Deng
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-14

Review 6.  Who will benefit more from maintenance therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Mingyi Zhou; Lingyu Fu; Jingdong Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-21

7.  Is there an efficacy-effectiveness gap between randomized controlled trials and real-world studies in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Zhang; Shihui Fu; Rui Meng; Yu Ren; Ye Shang; Lei Tian
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.