OBJECTIVE: To develop a measure of cancer services integration (CSI) that can inform clinical and administrative decision-makers in their efforts to monitor and improve cancer system performance. METHODS: We employed a systematic approach to measurement development, including review of existing cancer/health services integration measures, key-informant interviews and focus groups with cancer system leaders. The research team constructed a Web-based survey that was field- and pilot-tested, refined and then formally conducted on a sample of cancer care providers and administrators in Ontario, Canada. We then conducted exploratory factor analysis to identify key dimensions of CSI. RESULTS: A total of 1,769 physicians, other clinicians and administrators participated in the survey, responding to a 67-item questionnaire. The exploratory factor analysis identified 12 factors that were linked to three broader dimensions: clinical, functional and vertical system integration. CONCLUSIONS: The CSI Survey provides important insights on a range of typically unmeasured aspects of the coordination and integration of cancer services, representing a new tool to inform performance improvement efforts.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a measure of cancer services integration (CSI) that can inform clinical and administrative decision-makers in their efforts to monitor and improve cancer system performance. METHODS: We employed a systematic approach to measurement development, including review of existing cancer/health services integration measures, key-informant interviews and focus groups with cancer system leaders. The research team constructed a Web-based survey that was field- and pilot-tested, refined and then formally conducted on a sample of cancer care providers and administrators in Ontario, Canada. We then conducted exploratory factor analysis to identify key dimensions of CSI. RESULTS: A total of 1,769 physicians, other clinicians and administrators participated in the survey, responding to a 67-item questionnaire. The exploratory factor analysis identified 12 factors that were linked to three broader dimensions: clinical, functional and vertical system integration. CONCLUSIONS: The CSI Survey provides important insights on a range of typically unmeasured aspects of the coordination and integration of cancer services, representing a new tool to inform performance improvement efforts.
Authors: Peter P Budetti; Stephen M Shortell; Teresa M Waters; Jeffre A Alexander; Lawton R Burns; Robin R Gillies; Howard Zuckerman Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: L R Burns; J A Alexander; S M Shortell; H S Zuckerman; P P Budetti; R R Gillies; T M Waters Journal: Med Care Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Lisa R Dolovich; Kalpana M Nair; Donna K Ciliska; Hui N Lee; Stephen Birch; Amiram Gafni; Dereck L Hunt Journal: Health Soc Care Community Date: 2004-11
Authors: Margo C Orchard; Mark J Dobrow; Lawrence Paszat; Hedy Jiang; Patrick Brown Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Mary E Wiktorowicz; Marie-Josée Fleury; Carol E Adair; Alain Lesage; Elliot Goldner; Suzanne Peters Journal: Int J Integr Care Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 5.120
Authors: Anna R Gagliardi; Terri Stuart-McEwan; Julie Gilbert; Frances C Wright; Jeffrey Hoch; Melissa C Brouwers; Mark J Dobrow; Thomas K Waddell; David R McCready Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Annemarie A Uijen; Claire W Heinst; Francois G Schellevis; Wil J H M van den Bosch; Floris A van de Laar; Caroline B Terwee; Henk J Schers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mark J Dobrow; Margo C Orchard; Brian Golden; Eric Holowaty; Lawrence Paszat; Adalsteinn D Brown; Terrence Sullivan Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2008-10-16 Impact factor: 5.428