Literature DB >> 20676026

Multivalent epigenetic marks confer microenvironment-responsive epigenetic plasticity to ovarian cancer cells.

Sharmila A Bapat1, Victor Jin, Nicholas Berry, Curt Balch, Neeti Sharma, Nawneet Kurrey, Shu Zhang, Fang Fang, Xun Lan, Meng Li, Brian Kennedy, Robert M Bigsby, Tim H M Huang, Kenneth P Nephew.   

Abstract

"Epigenetic plasticity" refers to the capability of mammalian cells to alter their differentiation status via chromatin remodeling-associated alterations in gene expression. While epigenetic plasticity has been best associated with lineage commitment of embryonic stem cells, recent studies have demonstrated chromatin remodeling even in terminally differentiated normal cells, and advanced-stage melanoma and breast cancer cells, in context-dependent responses to alterations in their microenvironment. In the current study, we extend this attribute of epigenetic plasticity to aggressive ovarian cancer cells, by using an integrative approach to associate cellular phenotypes with chromatin modifications ("ChIP-chip") and mRNA and microRNA expression. While we identified numerous gene promoters possessing the well-known "bivalent mark" of H3K27me3/H3K4me2, we also report 14 distinct, lesser-known bi-, tri-, and tetravalent combinations of activating and repressive chromatin modifications, in platinum-resistant CP70 ovarian cancer cells. The vast majority (>90%) of all the histone marks studied localized to regions within 2000 bp of transcription start sites, supporting a role in gene regulation. Upon a simple alteration in the microenvironment, transition from two- to three-dimensional culture, an increase (17% to 38%) in repressive-only marked promoters was observed, concomitant with a decrease (31% to 21%) in multivalent (i.e., juxtaposed permissive and repressive histone marked) promoters. Like embryonic/tissue stem and other (non-ovarian) carcinoma cells, ovarian cancer cell epigenetic plasticity reflects an inherent transcriptional flexibility for context-responsive alterations in phenotype. It is possible that this plasticity could be therapeutically exploited for the management of this lethal gynecologic malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20676026      PMCID: PMC3052886          DOI: 10.4161/epi.5.8.13014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epigenetics        ISSN: 1559-2294            Impact factor:   4.528


  85 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian surface epithelium: biology, endocrinology, and pathology.

Authors:  N Auersperg; A S Wong; K C Choi; S K Kang; P C Leung
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  A computational genomics approach to identify cis-regulatory modules from chromatin immunoprecipitation microarray data--a case study using E2F1.

Authors:  Victor X Jin; Alina Rabinovich; Sharon L Squazzo; Roland Green; Peggy J Farnham
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Phenotypic plasticity and the epigenetics of human disease.

Authors:  Andrew P Feinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution.

Authors:  Nimet Maherali; Rupa Sridharan; Wei Xie; Jochen Utikal; Sarah Eminli; Katrin Arnold; Matthias Stadtfeld; Robin Yachechko; Jason Tchieu; Rudolf Jaenisch; Kathrin Plath; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  EZH2 is essential for glioblastoma cancer stem cell maintenance.

Authors:  Mario-Luca Suvà; Nicolò Riggi; Michalina Janiszewska; Ivan Radovanovic; Paolo Provero; Jean-Christophe Stehle; Karine Baumer; Marie-Aude Le Bitoux; Denis Marino; Luisa Cironi; Victor E Marquez; Virginie Clément; Ivan Stamenkovic
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.

Authors:  M B Eisen; P T Spellman; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Ovarian cancer cell detachment and multicellular aggregate formation are regulated by membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase: a potential role in I.p. metastatic dissemination.

Authors:  Natalie M Moss; Maria V Barbolina; Yueying Liu; Limin Sun; Hidayatullah G Munshi; M Sharon Stack
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  Multicellular spheroids in ovarian cancer metastases: Biology and pathology.

Authors:  Kristy Shield; M Leigh Ackland; Nuzhat Ahmed; Gregory E Rice
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Epigenetic "bivalently marked" process of cancer stem cell-driven tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Curt Balch; Kenneth P Nephew; Tim H-M Huang; Sharmila A Bapat
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.345

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  A double take on bivalent promoters.

Authors:  Philipp Voigt; Wee-Wei Tee; Danny Reinberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Oncofetal Epigenetic Bivalency in Breast Cancer Cells: H3K4 and H3K27 Tri-Methylation as a Biomarker for Phenotypic Plasticity.

Authors:  Terri L Messier; Joseph R Boyd; Jonathan A R Gordon; Janet L Stein; Jane B Lian; Gary S Stein
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 6.384

3.  Multicellular Tumor Spheroids Combined with Mass Spectrometric Histone Analysis To Evaluate Epigenetic Drugs.

Authors:  Peter E Feist; Simone Sidoli; Xin Liu; Monica M Schroll; Sharif Rahmy; Rina Fujiwara; Benjamin A Garcia; Amanda B Hummon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Epigenetic reprogramming as a key contributor to melanocyte malignant transformation.

Authors:  Fernanda Molognoni; Adriana T Cruz; Fabiana M Meliso; Alice S Morais; Camila F Souza; Patrícia Xander; Jared M Bischof; Fabrício F Costa; Marcelo B Soares; Gangning Liang; Peter A Jones; Miriam G Jasiulionis
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 5.  Epigenetic Attire in Ovarian Cancer: The Emperor's New Clothes.

Authors:  Daniela Matei; Kenneth P Nephew
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Higher order genomic organization and epigenetic control maintain cellular identity and prevent breast cancer.

Authors:  A J Fritz; N E Gillis; D L Gerrard; P D Rodriguez; D Hong; J T Rose; P N Ghule; E L Bolf; J A Gordon; C E Tye; J R Boyd; K M Tracy; J A Nickerson; A J van Wijnen; A N Imbalzano; J L Heath; S E Frietze; S K Zaidi; F E Carr; J B Lian; J L Stein; G S Stein
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Histones: Controlling Tumor Signaling Circuitry.

Authors:  Manoela D Martins; Rogerio M Castilho
Journal:  J Carcinog Mutagen       Date:  2013-07-29

Review 8.  Chromatin regulation and dynamics in stem cells.

Authors:  David C Klein; Sarah J Hainer
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Breast Cancer beyond the Age of Mutation.

Authors:  Mark A LaBarge; E Lorena Mora-Blanco; Susan Samson; Masaru Miyano
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 5.140

Review 10.  Chromatin remodeling and bivalent histone modifications in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Arigela Harikumar; Eran Meshorer
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 8.807

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.