Literature DB >> 20675864

Comparative analysis of analgesic efficacy of selected physiotherapy methods in low back pain patients.

Magdalena Charłusz1, Jowita Gasztych, Robert Irzmański, Jolanta Kujawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low back pain syndromes are one of the most frequent causes of movement limitation in populations of highly industrialized countries. They are listed as the main cause of inability to work among people of working age. Chronic pain and the associated limitation of movement underlie the quest for effective therapies. The use of ultrasound, LLLT, vacuum therapy with Ultra Reiz current in physical therapy of these patients prompts research over their effectiveness in the therapy of patients with low-back pain. The aim of the work was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of LLLT, ultrasound, and vacuum therapy with Ultra Reiz current in patients with low back pain.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved 94 people divided into three groups (A,B,C). Group A (n=35) received a series of 10 low energy laser therapy sessions (wave length 808 nm, surface density of radiation 510 mW/cm(2), continuous wave form, scanning mode, a dose of 12 J/cm(2) on a surface of 100 cm(2) [10x10cm]). Patients in Group B (n=27) had ultrasound sessions with a wave intensity of 1 W/cm(2) for 3 minutes. Patients in Group C (n=32) underwent vacuum therapy (8 kPa) combined with Ultra Reiz current. Subjective pain assessment was carried out using a modified Latinen questionnaire and a visual analogue scale of pain intensity. Lumbosacral spine mobility was evaluated with the Schober test and the finger-to- floor test.
RESULTS: In Group A, following low energy laser therapy, a statistically significant decrease in pain intensity was observed, together with decreased analgesic consumption compared to the other groups. In Group C, following vacuum therapy combined with Ultra Reiz currents, a significant decrease in the frequency of pain was observed together with increased physical activity compared to both Groups A and B, assessed according to a modified Laitinen pain indicator questionnaire. The biggest improvement in global spine mobility and lumbosacral flexion was observed in Group C (vacuum therapy plus Ultra Reiz current) compared to the other groups. However, the most significant improvement in lower spine extension was noted in Group B (ultrasound).
CONCLUSIONS: 1. The study showed slightly higher analgesic efficacy of laser biostimulation in comparison to vacuum therapy combined with Ultra Reiz current in patients with low back pain. 2. A more prominent increase in lumbosacral spine mobility was observed after vacuum therapy combined with Ultra Reiz current and ultrasound therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20675864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ortop Traumatol Rehabil        ISSN: 1509-3492


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Therapeutic Effect of Low Level Laser in Controlling Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Leyla Kholoosy; Dariush Elyaspour; Mohammad Reza Akhgari; Zahra Razzaghi; Zeinab Khodamardi; Masume Bayat
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-15

2.  Low intensity laser and LED therapies associated with lateral decubitus position and flexion exercises of the lower limbs in patients with lumbar disk herniation: clinical randomized trial.

Authors:  Maria Ester I Mendes de Carvalho; Reynaldo Mendes de Carvalho; Amélia Pasqual Marques; Lorena Mendes de Carvalho Lucio; Antonio César Almeida de Oliveira; Osmar Pinto Neto; Antonio Balbin Villaverde; Carlos José de Lima
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Safoora Ebadi; Nicholas Henschke; Bijan Forogh; Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari; Maurits W van Tulder; Arash Babaei-Ghazani; Ehsan Fallah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-05

4.  Symptom-modifying effects of oral avocado/soybean unsaponifiables in routine treatment of knee osteoarthritis in Poland. An open, prospective observational study of patients adherent to a 6-month treatment.

Authors:  Piotr Głuszko; Małgorzata Stasiek
Journal:  Reumatologia       Date:  2016-11-28

5.  Novel imaging methods reveal positive impact of topical negative pressure application on tissue perfusion in an in vivo skin model.

Authors:  Wibke Müller-Seubert; Sascha Roth; Theresa Hauck; Andreas Arkudas; Raymund E Horch; Ingo Ludolph
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.