Literature DB >> 20675446

Adaptation of methanogenic communities to the cofermentation of cattle excreta and olive mill wastes at 37 degrees C and 55 degrees C.

Marta Goberna1, Maria Gadermaier, Carlos García, Bernhard Wett, Heribert Insam.   

Abstract

The acclimatization of methanogens to two-phase olive mill wastes (TPOMW) was investigated in pilot fermenters started up with cattle excreta (37°C) and after changing their feed to excreta plus TPOMW (37°C or 55°C) or TPOMW alone (37°C) until a steady state was reached (28 days). Methanogenic diversity was screened using a phylogenetic microarray (AnaeroChip), and positive targets were quantified by real-time PCR. Results revealed high phylogenetic richness, with representatives of three out of the four taxonomic orders found in digesters. Methanosarcina dominated in the starting excreta (>96% of total 16S rRNA gene copies; over 45 times more abundant than any other methanogen) at high acetate (0.21 g liter(-1)) and ammonia N concentrations (1.3 g liter(-1)). Codigestion at 37°C induced a 6-fold increase of Methanosarcina numbers, correlated with CH(4) production (r(Pearson) = 0.94; P = 0.02). At 55°C, the rise in temperature and H(2) partial pressure induced a burst of Methanobacterium, Methanoculleus, Methanothermobacter, and a group of uncultured archaea. The digestion of excreta alone resulted in low but constant biogas production despite certain oscillations in the methanogenic biomass. Unsuccessful digestion of TPOMW alone was attributed to high Cu levels inducing inhibition of methanogenic activity. In conclusion, the versatile Methanosarcina immediately adapted to the shift from excreta to excreta plus TPOMW and was responsible for the stimulated CH(4) production at 37°C. Higher temperatures (55°C) fostered methanogenic diversity by promoting some H(2) scavengers while yielding the highest CH(4) production. Further testing is needed to find out whether there is a link between increased methanogenic diversity and reactor productivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20675446      PMCID: PMC2950471          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00961-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  27 in total

Review 1.  Prokaryotic diversity and its limits: microbial community structure in nature and implications for microbial ecology.

Authors:  Thomas P Curtis; William T Sloan
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.934

2.  Performance and microbial communities of a continuous stirred tank anaerobic reactor treating two-phases olive mill solid wastes at low organic loading rates.

Authors:  B Rincón; F Raposo; R Borja; J M Gonzalez; M C Portillo; C Saiz-Jimenez
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Influence of environmental conditions on methanogenic compositions in anaerobic biogas reactors.

Authors:  Dimitar Karakashev; Damien J Batstone; Irini Angelidaki
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Electron transfer in syntrophic communities of anaerobic bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Alfons J M Stams; Caroline M Plugge
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Toxicity of copper to acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic activities of methanogens and sulfate reducers in anaerobic sludge.

Authors:  Srilakshmi Karri; Reyes Sierra-Alvarez; Jim A Field
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 6.  An overview on olive mill wastes and their valorisation methods.

Authors:  A Roig; M L Cayuela; M A Sánchez-Monedero
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 7.145

Review 7.  Methanosaeta, the forgotten methanogen?

Authors:  Kerry S Smith; Cheryl Ingram-Smith
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 17.079

8.  Diversity and structure of the methanogenic community in anoxic rice paddy soil microcosms as examined by cultivation and direct 16S rRNA gene sequence retrieval.

Authors:  R Grosskopf; P H Janssen; W Liesack
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Effect of dilution rate on structure of a mesophilic acetate-degrading methanogenic community during continuous cultivation.

Authors:  Toru Shigematsu; Yueqin Tang; Hiromi Kawaguchi; Kana Ninomiya; Junji Kijima; Tsutomu Kobayashi; Shigeru Morimura; Kenji Kida
Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Microbial population dynamics during start-up and overload conditions of anaerobic digesters treating municipal solid waste and sewage sludge.

Authors:  Katherine D McMahon; Dandan Zheng; Alfons J M Stams; Roderick I Mackie; Lutgarde Raskin
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  14 in total

1.  The effect of maize silage as co-substrate for swine manure on the bacterial community structure in biogas plants.

Authors:  K Fliegerová; J Mrázek; M Kajan; S M Podmirseg; H Insam
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Direct interspecies electron transfer between Geobacter metallireducens and Methanosarcina barkeri.

Authors:  Amelia-Elena Rotaru; Pravin Malla Shrestha; Fanghua Liu; Beatrice Markovaite; Shanshan Chen; Kelly P Nevin; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Molecular analysis of meso- and thermophilic microbiota associated with anaerobic biowaste degradation.

Authors:  Jarmo Ritari; Kaisa Koskinen; Jenni Hultman; Jukka M Kurola; Maritta Kymäläinen; Martin Romantschuk; Lars Paulin; Petri Auvinen
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.605

4.  Hot transcriptomics.

Authors:  Jasper Walther; Pawel Sierocinski; John van der Oost
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.273

5.  Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology.

Authors:  Veronica Moset; Morten Poulsen; Radziah Wahid; Ole Højberg; Henrik Bjarne Møller
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 5.813

6.  Improvement of biogas production by bioaugmentation.

Authors:  K L Kovács; N Ács; E Kovács; R Wirth; G Rákhely; Orsolya Strang; Zsófia Herbel; Z Bagi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Searching for links in the biotic characteristics and abiotic parameters of nine different biogas plants.

Authors:  Andreas Walter; Brigitte A Knapp; Theresa Farbmacher; Christian Ebner; Heribert Insam; Ingrid H Franke-Whittle
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 5.813

8.  Characterization of microbial community structure during continuous anaerobic digestion of straw and cow manure.

Authors:  Li Sun; Phillip B Pope; Vincent G H Eijsink; Anna Schnürer
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.813

Review 9.  Microbial ecology of anaerobic digesters: the key players of anaerobiosis.

Authors:  Fayyaz Ali Shah; Qaisar Mahmood; Mohammad Maroof Shah; Arshid Pervez; Saeed Ahmad Asad
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-19

Review 10.  The microbiology of olive mill wastes.

Authors:  Spyridon Ntougias; Kostas Bourtzis; George Tsiamis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.